[quote=@DarkwolfX37]
<Snipped quote by Dynamics>

Of course the FCC isn't on our side, but the "oh there were no problems before this so there'll be none if we get rid of it" is bullshit, it's PROVEN that it works, there are tons of cases where ISPs were doing bullshit that they weren't able to once it passed. Plus, if nothing else, keeping it there increases the chances of new ISPs rising up to challenge the monopolies that currently exist.
[/quote]

Except it's not. Have you not seen the ISP conglomeration bonanza the past several years Title II has been in effect? AT&T is attempting to merge with Time Warner, of all companies, and the FCC doesn't care. All they care about is spying on American citizens and with them in charge, they won't attack ISPs. You only end up getting destroyed by both ends because this deal allows the government to enter and throw in their own special spice of regulation. The ISP monopoly problem was created [i]by[/i] the government, and you don't fix a problem caused by governmental influence with more governmental influence. The FTC is more limited when it comes to hurting consumers through government means and they have a much better track record for actually stopping big business from going out of control. And, if you read the repeal terms, you'll find the following:

"Section 1 of the Sherman Act bars contracts, combinations, or conspiracies in restraint of trade, making anticompetitive arrangements illegal. If ISPs reached agreements to unfairly block, throttle, or discriminate against Internet conduct or applications, these agreements would be per se illegal under the antitrust laws.518"

This quote prevents ISPs from doing exactly what you're expressing concern over. If they attempt to discriminate against data and block it/slow it down based on the content type, the FTC will invoke the restrictions outlined in the Sherman Act Antitrust Laws, Section 144, p.85.