[quote=@Dark Wind] “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in [deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe’s] office that there's no way he gets elected -- but I'm afraid we can't take that risk. It's like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you're 40…” I don't know, man. That's a pretty sketchy text message that potentially suggests launching an investigation with no proof for a prolonged period of time in order to sink him and his approval numbers. [/quote] First off. These two agents did not start the investigation. They did not run it. They were both removed from it as soon as Mueller discovered their opinions on Trump. [quote]Yes, an agent can harbor an opinion, but any eagerness to push forward because of their bias does throw some doubts upon the credibility of the investigation. [/quote] They didn't push forward because of their bias. These messages were from before the investigation began. Questioning the credibility of the [b]entire[/b] investigation over two dismissed agents is idiotic. Neither one has been involved in the investigation for months now. [quote] 1) Good for Rod Rosenstein. So what? This does not mean Rod Rosenstein harbors no political biases or motivations of his own. [/quote] He was a Trump apointee. He was the man that pushed for Trump to dismiss Comey. [quote] 2) Good for Mueller and his party registration. So what? Joe Scarborough was/is a Republican, but that doesn't mean he follows Republican ideology to a T. Jeff Flake is a republican, but does that mean he's absolutely true to that to every single letter? Simply, the answer is no. People call people Democrats and Republicans "in name only" for a reason. Just because you are labeled or registered in a particular manner does not make you an unbiased party. [/quote] True. But Mueller was considered by Trump to replace Comey. His track record of bipartisanship speaks for itself. [quote] 3) The public opinion is another 'so what?' moment here. Public opinion does not equate to the correct opinion. [/quote] What is the 'correct opinion' then? Your own? It shows that this is a commonly held opinion that Trump is an idiot. [quote]Too many coincidences revolving around Mueller and his investigation. [url=http://www.nationalreview.com/article/454543/mueller-investigation-too-many-anti-trump-coincidences]Far too many.[/url][/quote] That website reeks of bias. “Special prosecutors, investigators, and counsels are usually a bad idea. They are admissions that constitutionally mandated institutions don’t work.” I wonder how they'd feel about a Clinton investigation. How many coincidences have we seen with members of the Trump administration and their ties to Russia? [quote] [hr]As it stands, I have no idea how long this investigation will go on. My opinion is that they have, and will continue to have nothing (on Trump), but will continue the investigation for as long as possible because the longer they can keep the shroud hovering above the more they can sway a decent number of the general public's thought on Trump and his administration. [/quote] Well that's your (biased) opinion. The investigation has given way to indictments of several people. No one knows whats going to happen next in it. Investigations take time.