Did you even read that? Nothing in there does what you're saying it does. All it does is make ISPs have to disclose it in their ToS, which I remind you, NOBODY READS. A lawyer could take that regulation and give an ISP basically total ability to do throttling and censorship because it's not actually covered in any of that. "is not outweighed by countervailing benefits to consumers" alone gives them total freedom because internet access at ALL could be considered in that. ""Many of the largest ISPs have committed in this proceeding not to block or throttle legal content." also means nothing, because any that didn't are fine and it won't actually be enforced if they did and do it anyway. "Finally, we expect that any attempt by ISPs to undermine the openness of the Internet would be resisted by consumers and edge providers." Yeah, and look how fucking effective it is. It's being totally ignored by the FCC, so why would the FTC be any better?