Did [i]you[/i] read what I put there? It said very clearly that it has to be apparent and properly communicated to the consumer so there is [i]reasonable[/i] expectation that the consumer knows about the limitations of their service. Again, it also states that if the FTC deems ISPs as abusing their power as the "gatekeepers of the net," they're going to hit them with antitrust acts because that's how the FTC operates. Right now, a majority of major ISPs have agreed to abide by net neutrality. Until they properly back out, they don't have a choice in the matter. Plus, the exact thing you're saying right now, [i]almost verbatim,[/i] is said to be acceptable under Title II regulations.
[hider=Proof the FCC doesn't care][img]http://i.magaimg.net/img/1zrx.png[/img][/hider]
Your entire argument rests on "Yeah, but they probably won't actually do anything about it." We have codified laws here that outline how the government is going to ensure that consumers don't get totally ripped off and we have the evidence to show that the FTC is significantly more likely to keep consumer interest in mind than the FCC. In the end, this repeal does one thing: Control transfers from the FCC back to the FTC. Companies could throttle before, the agreement now states that they're not allowed to under the FTC, only to speed up (i.e. they cannot create slow lanes, only fast lanes). Companies could opt-in before, they can opt-in now. The only argument to be made here is whether the FTC, with everything in the 200 page document in mind, will better protect consumers than the FCC under Title II. And that's the argument I'll fight to no end defending. The FTC is still the government, but it has consumers in mind far more than the FCC does.