[quote]While I understand the argument for both sides, I would rather not have ISPs pick and choose which sites I can access or pick the speed at which I can access it. Yes, if they were smart, they wouldn't charge for sites like Google, but if your current ISP is the only one you can get in your location, you're kind of S.O.L. for choices.
 
[/quote]

Consider this: did you vote for Ajit Pai, or for his opponent?

The answer of course is "neither." The FCC is an unelected, poorly-regulated, non-representative administrative entity. If you're in the camp -- and full disclosure, I'm not -- but if you're in the camp that thinks Net Neutrality's death is the end of the world, well, [i]you've kinda proven EXACTLY why the FCC should have nothing at all to do with it.[/i] You protested, you posted, maybe you even called your senator -- and it all meant precisely nothing, because you have no say whatsoever in what the FCC does. They do not answer to you, and they will never answer to you. 

Net Neutrality placed more power in the hands of the FCC. You've seen what happens now, when the FCC wants to do something you don't like. The lesson here is, you really didn't want them to have that power in the first place, regardless of your thoughts on the hypothetical issue Net Neutrality was intended to address.