[@Frettzo] Sort of neither of the things presented really...it was more the equivalent of those smoked out of your mind conversations you have about 'changing the world man' but instead one of you is sober just humoring the debate. Doesn't matter how seriously either person took it, but genius is about as diametrically opposed as it could get.

[@Normie] The only problem was this theory was all he had, and he somehow wanted evidence to debunk an impossible scenario. And his defenses of it, made it clear that his only point was based in fantasy and inaccuracies. Even in theory it goes against human nature and science, he also lambasted the idea of a theory of his theory, like he depended it to work in reality. There's a fine line between making fantasy scenarios and dogmatically defending those fantasy ideals. (Whether sarcastically or not.)