Honestly, if people are incapable of having a decent and intellectual argument, and instead are going to get riled up and upset, they should avoid this thread. Avoid all debatable discussions actually for it just may not be in your ("your" people in general) nature. Because those people are going to get mad and upset, and I'm just going to be going about my day indifferent and not able to relate.

I'm going to rewrite everything I've presented up to this point so people don't get misled by all the misunderstandings already presented.

1. The Test Forum discussion was discovered to be the “world-building” thread. Originally, people may not have known what a world-building thread was since this site doesn’t have one. I also notice that a lot of people only RP on this site versus multiple sites, and therefore, may not see innovated ideas for formatting and giving role players different ways to express their creativity.

2. The Character Sheet section and the RP Discussion were pointed out as being in the “Off-Topic” section. Since the “Test Forum” was also previously mentioned as possibly being changed, I suggested why not change all of them? Put Character Sheets and RP Discussion in a section related to Roleplaying.

3. It was suggested adding RP Tabs to the Test Forum, which I had mentioned doesn’t seem logical [url=https://www.roleplayerguild.com/posts/4573823]here[/url]. Maybe I wasn’t understanding the idea right, but world-building sections are pretty stand-alone but having moved the Character Sheets section under it would have not only gotten rid of an extra section but condensed it. So for example, the renamed “Test Forum” would take the place of how the “Advanced Roleplay” section is. Beneath it, would go “Character Sheets” as "Advanced Interest Checks" is under the Advanced Roleplay section. I hope that gives a visual of what I'm trying to say. In the overall section that World-Building would be in, it could be called “Out of Character” since the ideas are for “creation.” And RP Discussion can be moved beneath it as well.

4. I presented the idea for possibly using the same GM/co-GM collaborative administration techniques already offered with the 0th post as a feature in the World-Building section. This would allow people to build their worlds on this site "together" with whoever they list as co-Gms, in this sites format, and see what it all looks like overall before deciding whether to use the idea or leave it as a draft. It can even be used as a future idea.