[@Dynamo Frokane] Ignoring the discussion of "can" the U.K ban on several people, not just Laura Southern. (Yes. They can.) She was banned because of "christian terrorist extremism" and as oxymoron-ish as that feels in the modern era. I would love to see video evidence of her going all Antifa, smashing windows, hitting people with bike locks and the rest that rightfully gave them their label. I don't follow Laura, but I have a sneaking suspicion she never did any violence.

https://twitter.com/BrittPettibone/status/973553921615650818

https://twitter.com/Martin_Sellner/status/973331314026995713

The actual question, is how they did so and just how mixed up their priorities are...If they did for genuine safety concerns. Why did they let hundreds of ISIS supporters/fighters? 

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/isis-british-jihadis-return-uk-iraq-syria-report-islamic-state-fighters-europe-threat-debate-terror-a8017811.html

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/10/24/british-isil-fighters-have-return-home-western-country/

https://www.theguardian.com/music/musicblog/2015/sep/01/tyler-the-creator-comments-banned-uk-freedom-of-speech

They banned a random rapper before...for lyrics in his music. 

(I'd post various links of dumb laws and bans in the U.K, but takes away from my point.) 

The U.K is thought policing. And if they want to, fine. But they may want to stop the rape gangs and ISIS fighters, which will do far worse than "disrupt".