I chose my quotations with purpose, because if you believe even tangentially [i]any[/i] of what the new wave of conservatism believes, as in not the stereotyped "Republican in Name Only" types, you are now suddenly "Alt-Right" no matter what you believe or admit to being a skeptic of. By your own account you list a great number of people who are not entirely wrong in their assumptions even, be it the fact that there is suggestion the Charlottesville driver was originally attempting to leave to the fact some embrace the "Alt-Right" title, even to the point of parody like organizations as the "Alt-Knights" or the Kekistanis. Not to retread ground that you already just gave in added confirmation of this, I will note it is simply proof that there is a glaring double standard.

It is easy, convenient, and expedient to call one group all Alt-Right and throw everyone into it from the New Right, the "Alt-Right" as I said, to the [i]actual[/i] Alt-Right. I have discussed this at great length previously in this very topic, but my point here and now is that is essentially lifting from one and placing it upon them that which is not theirs, but denying the other openly embraces the identities and ideologies labeled on them by the number.

No less, please cease attempting to pretend I own any political faction as my own because I "prefer them". I would as soon throw anyone claiming to be the Right-wing under the turning wheels, McCain, Bannon, Scaramucci, et al., at their failure to [i]my[/i] standards as I would anyone on the Left-wing if we had or have overlap. No one is special, [@Pepperm1nts].