[@Dynamo Frokane] I'm assuming your arguing to be contrarian, because if I know you are but what am I is the best you got. I'm good. But it doesn't matter who it is. If I'm talking to you, but say @Harbinger can't talk about dogs because he's a cat lover. Same rule/fallacy applies. Yes I occasionally call things ad-hominem, when its just slanderous/character attack. (like it's any better.) But in this case you're incorrect. And I'm pretty sure I'm one of the very few people that ever uses the Strawman Fallacy in the proper context.

[@catchamber] It was a one party consent state, in a place with cameras everywhere since it was an event. The claim, I think was privacy...and Steven even went as far as to re-upload with blurry faces. But yeah it's pure blatant hypocrisy and I hope Prager and anyone else who has the money and balls sues the shit out of youtube.