[quote=@SleepingSilence]
[@Dynamo Frokane] I'm assuming your arguing to be contrarian, because if I know you are but what am I is the best you got. I'm good. But it doesn't matter who it is. If I'm talking to you, but say @Harbinger can't talk about dogs because he's a cat lover.[b] Same rule/fallacy applies.[/b] Yes I occasionally call things ad-hominem, when its just slanderous/character attack. (like it's any better.) But in this case you're incorrect. And I'm pretty sure I'm one of the very few people that ever uses the Strawman Fallacy in the proper context.

[/quote]

Except it doesn't because I'm not debating the person I'm insulting. You can't just re-apply meanings to terms because it sounds better, grow up. 

Also you are not the governing body on when a criticism becomes a 'slanderous character attack' and where that line is drawn. Its just your subjective feelings about who you think 'deserves' criticism more, which un-suprisingly doesn't hold up.

So if all you got is repeating that a criticism  is an Ad-homenim or strawman even when it's outside the context of a debate with the target in question, then I'm good. You can read your dictionary now.