[@Dynamo Frokane]

I could quote some pages back where essentially you named me a sympathizer and or supporter of these groups, as has happened in the past when I have advocated for or against various ideals here, but we are both well aware that is going to make absolutely no difference in the end result. Said end result is that as it has been before and it is a matter of implied or actual application of guilt by association. It would very much be a different story if any of us, though note I speak only for myself as I do not follow others' posts frequently or to any extent, adhered to these beliefs, but the cornerstone of the argument still stands; you might elaborate here and now specifically what you mean and why you mean, but not too long ago that was a different story.

Granted I can understand your call to arms against what you perceive is racist, but for some of us that is becoming an increasingly sweeping argument, even here. Come to think of it, I do not know of a time where anyone said James Allsup wasn't probably or actually a racist, or that Generation Identity and its brother organizations probably do include racists, a number of whom unquestionably are radicals or do act on it, but there has been a strong undercurrent that simply because we are posing the contrary investigation on it stains our hands somehow as well. So far, given they haven't [i]done[/i] anything notably harmful, that is a bit out of place; I certainly wouldn't be, and still haven't even had the moment of thought, to defend collectives as Stormfront or organizations as the Ku Klux Klan just as I would not Antifa, Black Lives Matter, or any Wahhabist Muslims as in the now obliterated Islamic State, as they have long since lost any guise of protection owing to their violence and discrimination. I do not believe in pursuing "thought crimes", to put it frankly, or "speech crimes" for that matter.