[quote=@POOHEAD189] I think the context is: If someone has gender dysphoria, they should be allowed to use the restroom they identify with. I can see some potential problems if someone [i]claims[/i] to be gender fluid, but that's just assuming the person is dishonest. And since there is no data that supports there have been any real issues in states that have allowed such things, then I'd say it's a nonissue. [/quote] Just to point out really quick, I'm not one of those people that think, if you let transgenders use whatever bathroom they want legally based on just taking them at their word. That somehow, the transgenders will suddenly commit an endless spree of unspeakable actions with their actual disorder as a cover. I'm someone who thinks, that perverted criminals, if given the option to get off scott-free with getting into their preferred bathroom of arousal. If all they need to do, to immediately not be punished, is to claim "i'm different I swear." Then just maybe out laws shouldn't be implemented so vaguely. And what I just described, certainly isn't a non-issue. But seriously, on the transgender military thing. No one currently in the military should be effected, and I don't think the law would have done so either. Not sure if the new one proposed is any different or even tangible. But ignoring the fact the military is strict and should be when accepting, is disingenuous. Which certainly feels like how that conversation was going.