[quote=@Fabricant451]
[@Dynamo Frokane] Wolfenstein isn't exactly making a statement other than "Nazis are bad and killing Nazis is fun". That people got upset that the game is about killing fake Nazis in a fake take on history was both hilarious and stupid. Far Cry 5 is very much using certain aspects of the current social and political climate to garner attention but then pretty much doing nothing with it other than correctly having some characters use terms like "libtards". It ruffled certain feathers because "Oh I'm killing [i]white conservative Americans and I'm one of those uh oh[/i]" but it amounted to little other than white noise. I'm not giving Ubisoft any props for taking advantage of a certain climate but I am rolling my eyes that some reviewers can't get over the fact the game doesn't swing as hard in the direction they wanted it to. 

I haven't played the new Wolfenstein sequel so if they do something other than 'Nazis bad, B.J. good' then that's news to me. But I'd also say that Wolfenstein: The New Order and by association The New Colossus are better written games than Far Cry 5 anyway. 
[/quote]

I'd probably agree that Wolfenstien is better written than Far Cry 5, not that is any sort of achievement mind you.

However, I still think the whole 'white conservative' thing is misplaced by people who have only seen the box-art. The [b]protagonists [/b]in the resistance of Montana are the conservatives, gun toting, patriotic, beer swilling, fake southern accent republican types. The people you kill are based more on the Jim Jones cult, who ironically were a spiritual, progressive for the time, hippy type outfit, (which obviously morphed into something much more like a authoritarian, dogmatic dictatorship). But very few cults apart from things like Scientology start out as anything resembling the 'right wing' as Americans know it.

People really need to read the synopsis.