[@Lmpkio]
Alright, so it's the wording you've issue with rather than the actual content of the points I raised? While yes, it is dry and straightforward to keep things simple, how was my criticism not constructive? I point out things I feel can be improved upon, explain why I feel the way I do and propose ways I believe it can be worked on, I've even provided a few examples of relevant works. I can't control whether other people have their own questions, I just put down mine. As for the GM being new to the site, this is true, but considering he said he'd had this in mind for five years and implied D&D experience I figured a few questions wouldn't be a problem.

[@ArmorPlated]
That's fair, but in my own experience it's usually best to just ask? A GM can tell their players what the game they're playing is like/about or they haven't considered this or that and it gets ironed out, or just say that's important for later. I don't think discussion is pointless in that way, at least not as long as the players have a leg to stand on with their points, it can help polish a game or add to its setting consistently if mined for ideas.

[@Archmage MC]
Eh, if you've got issues work it out with the guy, you know? That's not on me, I'm just here raising and defending my points. I don't think Overwatch is a scam, not really more than any given MMO which for full disclosure I am biased against, but I do think it's creatively soulless as far as lore and character design is concerned.