[quote=@Lady Amalthea]
[@Mara] Think that would boil down to what the over all feel from a group would be. Moving an RP that has reached a certain point from Casual to Advanced is something I have asked a moderator about. I was told it was no problem. Great. Then I took it to my group and we spoke about it. [url=https://image.ibb.co/mnDXmJ/Arp.jpg]A vote was cast.[/url] The over all decision was to remain because while the Rp's might be heavy in layout and rules, when it comes to actual posting, the majority of people are straight casual. Sure, we have advanced posts - as far as length goes - but much of the time content is not. (Or they are longer posts because of collabing, time skips, etc.) 

	Now we do have several still up in the air since there was talk about them moving more than others - Soulless Regency, Paradox, and Darker specifically. Yet we are still discussing it. Will any ever be moved on my request? Yet to be seen. If they get moved by a mod because of an over all change on the forum, no worries from me. Future RP's? Yeah, have at least one that will most likely be hosted in Advanced but that is simply because it is the first I have in the works in a very long time that I feel, by [i][b]my personal standards[/b][/i], is an Advanced RP.
[/quote]

I mean, for the longest time I thought your roleplays [i]were[/i] in Advanced. Got kind of a surprise to see them pop up in Casual.

Anyways, moving onto your point. If my memory serves me right, my first ever roleplay when I joined RPG was an Advanced roleplay. I was far below the standards — my posts were underdeveloped and contained little information relevant to the roleplay, a stark contrast to the rest of the group. I wasn't kicked out or called out for it, I was allowed to stay with my Casual-level writing in an indisputably Advanced roleplay. I'm surprised I was even accepted in the first place, given I fumbled up with the application itself a few times due to my own sheer ignorance for the information provided in the OP. Yet I was accepted and posted my measly posts.

The point of that analogy was to underline my point about having a group of players with varying skill levels in Advanced — it's completely fine. The sections are less about the players there and more about the actual roleplays. If a roleplay meets the definition of Advanced, then it doesn't matter what level players join, it belongs in Advanced. It's up to the GM to accept and deny those who meet the standards and those who do not. Personally, I think encouraging players to dip their toes into Advanced works wonders for not only their confidence but their writing and dedication. It doesn't have to be that intimidating.

EDIT: Until then, however, there's no need for a redundant tag like High Casual. You want your roleplay to have pages worth of rules but remain in Casual? Cool. It's a Casual roleplay. You can have all the rules in the world but in my eyes it doesn't bump up the skill level of the roleplay, it just increases the entry bar.

Also, there are obviously certain exceptions to my worldview of mixed skill levels to reduce usage of the High Casual tag. One liners are, of course, not really fitting for Casual or Advanced roleplays. I'm thinking more along the lines of 1 - 2 paragraphs minimum for both sections, given we all get writer's block sometimes and just don't know what to say. I still firmly believe the sections aren't about length and instead quality, dedication and world building.