[quote=@vancexentan]
Well my character is a one note egotistical jerk who cares more about the stats of the gunpla that he sees than the people flying it. He's already proven himself to be a stick in the mud. If you got a problem with way other people are thinking about your character then you'll either have to express him in a different way, and or ask people kindly to just stop referring to him in such a way. Angry outbursts aren't going to do you any good. I could say any number of things at the moment. In a kingdom hearts roleplay I'm in, [b]its pretty much living dead at this point[/b] but thats besides the point, the gm called my character edgy, probably due to his sucky childhood, before I even got a chance to post I just told him I didn't think of it that way, and moved on.

If you wanna keep on raving at us that's your choice but in my opinion you're not doing yourself any favors by doing so. 
[/quote]

Not even relevant, so why point that out? It's almost like you're trying to get a reaction out of me. Well I guess it sort of succeeded, but I digress. If you want to compare situations, then okay, let's compare the two scenarios. In the game you mentioned, the GM didn't even use the term edgy. That was one of the other players who, I must stress, is not a GM and therefore whose words were without real weight. The term the GM used specifically, I believe, was "brooding loner". And no, I'm not arguing semantics, I'm arguing that there's a legitimate difference between using a term like "brooding loner" and just straight up calling someone an edgelord. The former is not a negative term, nor does it suggest any sort of negativity. Edgy or Edgelord on the other hand? Those are clearly meant to be insulting and not constructive in anyway.

Oh and by the way, that game is not dead. I'm still very much keeping tabs on it. It's stagnant right now, yes, but that's because I made the mistake of allowing downtime that everyone decided to ignore which of course leads to the current stagnation.