[@catchamber] Okay, so three follow up questions.

1a. So given the first two statements, you acknowledge that socialism doesn't mean results either? So if you acknowledge all can fail, which of course they can. What evidence do you have that meshing socialism and capitalism would be an effective system?

1b. How is the collectivism ('well being of society at large') supposed to mesh with individualism? ([url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GXE_n2q08Yw][i]'singing appropriate song'[/i][/url]) These things are opposites of each other...

2. What is Marxism and Communism under your definitions? What do they attempt to achieve? Since they're totally different from socialism.

3. And if Capitalism sole purpose is money. What is Corporatism? And what is Crony Capitalism? They aren't the same thing are they? If not, why do the sound the same under your definitions?