[quote=@Pepperm1nts]
I absolutely love how you unironically linked to conservapedia and newcriterion. Then you complain when people call out your sources as being extremely biased and/or opinion pieces by conservative writers. I mean, really dude, you're setting yourself up and destroying your own credibility when you do this shit, it's funny. It's also very telling that the conservapedia page is like 70% devoted to controversies, lmao. Totes a legit source. [color=fff200]And didn't you criticize me when I linked to a wikipedia article defining social democracy? [/color]H I L A R I O U S. Wikipedia = bad and easily manipulated, conservapedia = totes legit and trustworthy. Get real.
[/quote]

That was a very civil way to counter a single point I made...

Oh wait.

[color=fff79a]Maybe, you should check that before you fling accusations, like a monkey flings their shit.[/color] The answer is no. I didn't attack you for simply using a source that I disagreed with. I asked you a personal question on what you believed something was, and you gave me a wikipedia article. Which didn't actually fully answer my question. So I commented on that fact, and made a sarcastic remark about wiki-pages being wrong sometimes. 

Maybe if you could actually use those cogs, supposed to be in your brain and not squarely in your ass. You'd notice I replied to a wikipage which I -didn't- make a negative note of, because it was actually relevant to the conversation.

But sure, if I thought for a second any one who thought that was witty, was remotely intelligent enough to debate my sources points. I'd care more about using different articles. You make it incredibly difficult to speak this cordially and not directly insult you, but you do a well enough job embarrassing yourself. ^_^