[quote=@SimpleWriter]
From Amber point of view, it was cutting to the point by skipping useless waste of time socializing in an awkward place, which was said out loud. Weirdly social for a cat. I'll make him eat back his thoughts in my next post. 

Since I messed up and some of the others don't seem up with the idea of regrouping, what do we do for time skip? Right now people are still interacting, but I mean for after that. 

I had hope to wait on my next post until everyone was ready to leave, but I don't want to time skip if everyone's gonna split up?

[@CAS1006] Call me blind, but how did we ignore your post? I thought I had answered him. he doesn't seem to share Amber's logic, but she answered nonetheless. Even if she basically said 'Later.' >>
[/quote]

The Tribunal for one did address with courtesy, Vale sorta ignored it, but only addressed him after he decided to lay out ground ideas. No where am I the player mad, just amused. Even stated her fears are completely rational before that had a chance to happen.

In fact, no where in your [i]post[/i] did you specify who she is interacting with outside of just "The room.", and Vale. It leaves a sour impression when she is not going to make eye contact. 

Thirdly, if data can flow fast and freely, just about instantaneously, it literally would make sense to send him the data on the spot so he could review it, [i]BEFORE[/i] leaving. That way when they do get ready to leave, he has all the notes for an intelligent conversation, so yeah, leaving him out of the loop is rude and squanders his time. 

If that is the course of your character, that is your character. 

No where am I literally attacking anyone, so wanna chill out?

Hell, nowhere am I saying to change your post, if your character is meant to be like that, let her be like that. [i]Perception [/i] leads to interesting chemistry. It lets characters have an opinion based on how they see it.

And that leads to perspective.