[@Scarescrow] [quote]Yeah, I must have admitted. The ability is quite bad when I look back. Point taken. Thankfully, I am making another ability before the review was up and hopefully have the new ability in the next draft. [/quote] To be clear, the broad idea was good. It makes sense for the Love god to make mortals swoon over him. In fact, I [i]expect[/i] the Love god to make mortals swoon over him. We just need to make sure that the ability is of a power level appropriate to a demigod with the Love portfolio. Bear in mind that if you want a more powerful version of the ability (beyond what the Portfolio can grant for free), you can always spend MP on it later. In fact, if you want to go for Idolization as your second Portfolio, it might make sense to purchase the ability which makes mortals literally worship you as part of your investment towards that Portfolio. [quote] Yeah, do you remember the Ainz's appendage that you send it to some remote islands/sandbars? Yeah, it is Adam. [/quote] I do wonder how the Architect would respond to a demigod growing in his palace-lake after he thought all the gods were gone (as this limb isn't on Galbar. It's up by the Barrier). This isn't an issue. It's just a comment. [quote]Introduce love to all beings. This love, however, is not the sentient loves that we are used to. It is the drive or biological love, mating, survive, kind of that. The effect it has, hopefully, is some of the creation should not behave the way they are designed. Take an example of Phystene's plants. Her portfolio allows her to raise plants and let them die to her wills. Now, she could still do it, but some plants ( 1% of the crops) will refuse to die. And the more they grew and reproduced, the less control she has over those rebellious plants. But this doesn't apply to her only. Parvus' s insects are also the same. Basically, this introduces the chance of a being to withdrawn from the idea of dying for its creator. [/quote] I'm not sure how rebellion ties in with Love. Are you withdrawing love of their creators from nature? Additionally, revoking Portfolio powers is not something that can be easily done. If Phystene tells a plant to die, unless someone has dumped significantly more MP into that particular plant than Phystene is willing to spend, then [i]that plant will die[/i]. Portfolios grant total superiority in everything under them and no demigod's meddling can prevent that. That said, if we stop short of blocking Portfolios, making creations more rebellious seems like a neat idea. Note, however, that a demigod does not have the power to introduce a thing to [i]all[/i] beings without going around spending Might on each group of beings individually. Grand overarching changes to reality require a Sphere. [quote][list][*]After that, I create the drive for evolution. Basically, this means that the beings that got affected will desire to be better than staying the same. So, for the plants, it will kill each other on a larger scale for nutrients and sunlight. The bugs would be more prone to devour each other than act in unison. Same for bacteria. [*] After that, I create the first predator. If everyone is creating producers and no one is really planning to create the top of the food chain, I don't mind creating something that dominates the ecosystems. [/list][/quote] This overlaps significantly with [url=https://divinus-iii.fandom.com/wiki/Kalmar]Kalmar's[/url] plans. You might be able to create evolution, although Kalmar is definitely making predators. Talk to [@NotFishing]. This doesn't stop you from making some predators, but Kalmar will almost certainly out-compete you there. Additionally, gods have already created ecosystems which implies the existence of predators, so even if you were to make a predator [i]right now[/i] it would not be the first. Creating evolution in all things without a Sphere sounds like an incredibly difficult task. You might need to collaborate with other gods (probably Kalmar) to help you in that task. [quote]Creating gold and ruby veins[/quote] This sounds fine, although talk to [@Commodore] because [url=https://divinus-iii.fandom.com/wiki/Ohannakeloi]Ohannakeloi[/url] also looks interested in that sort of stuff. [quote]Save up for whatever I have for the next turn, 2 turns for portfolio acquisition and a dozen fp more to make his Heaven on Earth-esque city. Maybe I would create sentient beings, maybe more of something to work forward "idolization" portfolio. [/quote] This. This is the kind of plan I want to hear about. The rest sound mostly like set-up and things to bide your time until you're able to make mortals, as Adam will truly shine once he has mortals to put under his sway. It is unclear when FP will be able to be used for creating a city (definitely not the Age of Creation or the Age of Monsters), so you may either be saving, waiting or creating it in increments. You will likely want to enlist the help of some other gods to make your city better than what Adam can build by his own power. This plan is currently too far in the future for anyone to be able to predict the specifics of how it will be enacted. We don't even know all the sentient beings being made or all the continents being raised. However, can you elaborate a little bit on your current vision for your city and cult? (Although you don't need to divulge everything. Save some for the IC. I only ask for enough to spark my interest.) [quote]By this point, sure. My eyes can't catch any problems but I guess that is because of my background. So sure.[/quote] I proofread your Portfolio. Your portfolio contained the highest density of such mistakes, with the rest of the CS being less bad. Most of the corrections are sufficiently nuanced that I've noticed that grammar-checking software misses them. [hider=Original] What is love’s capabilities? Can it moves mountains, drains seas, and endures the test of time like other things? Is it tangible and has definite value? Yet why do people flocked after it likes flies over an open honey jar? Couldn’t they realize the danger of drowning once they get too deep? Love is pure, they think. Love is good, they assume. To love is to have a cause to die for. To love is to be obsessed by the idea of sacrificing. As such, Adam, the owner of obsession, is capable of turning any men and women into his disciple by making him their gods. Peoples are puppets in his disposal. Blood flows and chants shook the night skies where he decided to pay a visit. For as long as there are still beings that desire, whether it is physical or mental, Adam’s influence knows no bound. [/hider] [hider=Proofread] What is love’s capabilities? Can it [color=ed1c24]move[/color] mountains, [color=ed1c24]drain[/color] seas, [color=00aeef]or[/color] [color=ed1c24]endure[/color] the test of time like other things? Is it tangible [color=00aeef]or[/color] [color=82ca9d]does it[/color] [color=00aeef]have[/color] definite value? Yet why do people [color=ed1c24]flock[/color] after it [color=ed1c24]like[/color] flies over an open honey jar? Couldn’t they realize the danger of drowning once they get too deep? Love is pure, they think. Love is good, they assume. To love is to have a cause to die for. To love is to be obsessed by the idea of sacrificing. As such, Adam, the owner of obsession, is capable of turning any [color=ed1c24]man[/color] [color=00aeef]or[/color] [color=ed1c24]woman[/color] into his disciple by making him their [color=ed1c24]god[/color]. [color=ed1c24]People[/color] are puppets [color=00aeef]at[/color] his disposal. Blood flows and chants [color=00aeef]shake[/color] the night skies where he [color=00aeef]decides[/color] to pay a visit. For as long as there are still beings that desire, whether it is physical or mental, Adam’s influence knows no bound. [hider=Key] [color=ed1c24]Removed pluralisation[/color] [color=00aeef]Changed word[/color] [color=82ca9d]Added words[/color] [/hider][/hider]