[@Kal-El] [quote]1. Well discharging it for punches and kicks is the primary reason for the whole quirk. Be honestly worthless without it. I can take out using it for far range attacks tho. Discharging in an explosive manner makes sense as in loss of.[/quote] I don't see why it would be worthless, but I get that you wanted kind of a melee hero that strikes with Lightning enhanced attacks. However, simply having electricity in your fists or kicks don't make them stronger, it take makes them a taser. If by "enhance" you meant exactly that, then no issue. If you also meant to upgrade the strength of, then the explanation of the Quirk is lacking. Regardless, it makes more sense if he learns to control it rather than start controlling it. [quote]2. Never had the idea for him having an actual turbine on his body. Just another way his body processes air. As said power wouldnt work with an actual turbine on his body cause clothes. [/quote] If his body process air, then it's a mutation within a regular human body, agree? Because no one else can. Therefore, his Quirk is a Mutation type. If it was an emitter, he's just spew out electricity. Since it's a Mutation, there need to be an explanation as to how to body does it if he has no actual an easily identifiable way to show it. Noxious, the villain's leader, has Poisonous skin - although I didn't put it on the sheet, there's a biological reason for it. See what I mean? It's lacking in explanation. I need to know how it process the air, or [i]at least[/i] how it transforms it into electricity. [quote]3. Idk if im okay with Kaminari weakness of short circuiting the brain. Cause well powers arent the same technically. Prefer the weakness I placed. [/quote] It was an example from KoL. Although I also think his drawback is too little to what potential he would have. Empowered melee attack, powerful AoE, Ranged attack versus limited energy. You go on about long lasting battles, but in MHA battles tend to be quite short compared to other stories of the same type. I'm ready to accept it, maybe, but under a watchful eye.