[@Dark Light]Absolutely. A Weapon could be anything; a coin, a gun, paper that you fold into an airplane. However, it's not something that is intrinsically attached to a participant like a Totem is. Rather, a Weapon represents the Desire within the Participant. It is, for all purposes, a tool to achieve that Desire. The more familiar a Participant becomes with their Weapon, the more likely a Sponsor is to unlock the next tier of its potential. Mind you, this can also be done solely by the Participant. 

In summation, Weapons take many shapes and come equipped with many locks. Usually they are created by the Sponsor specifically for the Desire that their Participant holds.

 Totems can be things like; a watch, a backpack, a necklace. Essentially, the huge difference is in their functionality and capability to be an accessory. They also differ in the purpose to the Participant. Totems are usually given to those with deepset emotional issues, as a sort of guide that can reach them in a way their Sponsor would fail at. Weapons are reliant on creative usage and being [i]imbued[/i] to increase the range of their power. Totems adapt to their wielder, becoming a mirror of their personality; while simultaneously guiding them along a path of 'growth' to facilitate their union and a wider array of abilities. 

In summation, Totems take many shapes and locks; but take steps to guide their wielder, since they are one. Losing a Totem, having it forcibly separated or destroyed, would render the Participant incomplete...as though a part of themselves died with the Totem. Weapon Class Participants don't suffer this same condition, but are usually asked to make a sacrifice if their Weapon is destroyed.

Similarities exist between them, however, which often makes it difficult to tell the Classes apart. Weapon Class Participants have a more rapid growth curve and work more closely with their Sponsor to realize their Desire and increase the power provided by the Weapon. Totem Class Participants usually work more closely with the Totem itself, rather than their Sponsor, leaving the progress of the wielder in their own hands//the hands of a representation of their psyche as they seek to 'mature' in some way.

I hope that cleared things up, a little. If you have suggestions on how I can word things differently in the Terms sections, or clarify with less verbiage; please let me know!

Also, welcome! I know you didn't quite say that you're interested, but I assumed you [i]may[/i] be.