[quote=@Balance]
<Snipped quote by Stabby>

Huh, this is pretty cool. I wonder how Arthur's powers of imagination might fit with this, if I can build something off of it. We'll have to brainstorm some time. Clarifying questions:

1. Is there such thing as a "subsequent nearby location" in a place without direction? How can people "observe" a non-sentient object?
2. Does an unconscious sentient entity cease to exist, or is it the non-sentient entities that it apprehends?
[/quote]

1. Yes. Due to the fact that it is still a space, things can be assigned a location relative to other things. And observe just means to keep track of. If you enter with clothes on, because you expect them to be there they won't dissappear. Likewise the same applies to an object that is brought with. If it's left behind however, the object is no longer expected to exist by something capable of observing it and breaks down in short time.

In short, non-dimensional doesn't mean non-locational, as it can still be located. You just have no mathematical way of determining it's location is all. And one observes things in the way they're most comfortable. If it's through sight, then they'll "see" the object. It's the same with any other form of perception.

2. The object ceases to exist, the sentient entity will have other problems if it stays unconscious for too long, be it gradual deterioration or other influences. I'll go back and make that clearer.