[@DracoLunaris]

I did say it was arguable for a reason, because it is really a matter of semantics, no offense, in that, unless Kath were to die or forget that information, she is the irreplaceable factor in the example. And, Chuunitrixx didn't steal Kath.

I'm not condoning the thievery, as it's just as wrong, but, there's a vast wealth of difference between a physical property like a single-print book and the metaphysical property of your very privacy.