[quote=@Fabricant451]
Do you think a critic knows better than the person who made the thing they are criticizing. 
[/quote]

Not necessarily, which is why I always eagerly and happily expect the good authors/writers, to follow through on anything a critic might have missed. Especially if it's specifically on a writing forum. ^-^

But sometimes? Yeah, the author does need someone to step in and go "hey, maybe don't do that." If you think that's wrong, you have no idea the process most writers go through.

And truthfully, writers are often the worst at judging their own merits. For better or for worse.

[quote=@Fabricant451]
You disagreed that there was an objective quality to story telling. 
[/quote]

Uh...no. No, I didn't do that. That was the other person.

[quote=@Fabricant451]
You cannot provide any example of the objective best way to tell a story.

Objectively, your post from 28 minutes ago is structured poorly.
[/quote]

Is this a "your an idiot" kind of ironic example of making the very same mistake within a critique? Where you meant, "I disagreed that there's [b]subjectivity[/b] to quality? If so, that's still not correct. I conceded on a personal level, the beauty is in the eyes of the beholder.

Also, from the very moment that this was posted, this already had the issue of being dated. (Because I've posted so much now, that I can't honestly tell which one that you're describing. (INB4, lul them all.)

But duly noted, regardless. I did my best to make my reply's of "you're an asshole, because I thought so." a little more...substantive let's say.