[quote=@Expolar]The idea to have the two character ideas mixed is a nice idea, especially as my response to such ideas is also, "Why not both?" lol. But I think I would prefer them to be separate. 

The elven character finding his own meaning of what he should do with his life than simply following the path given to by his family made for him makes it a bit interesting for me for when I step into his mind as he finds himself. As he think short term goals and past accomplishes, it helps me and my character think of what he feels is important and should truly pursue as a goal that it worth seeking and accomplishing.

The tiefling is a revamped version of a character I played in a old campaign like 2 years back. Felt a bit unsatisfied with how I made his initial story and motivation, especially as we progressed through the campaign as I questioned what he wanted. But with the current changes mentioned here. I like as it gives him the short term focus on his siblings and the long term focus of finding answers to their parents disappearance.[/quote]

Yeah I can understand that. So yeah, they're your concepts so naturally do whatever you'd like to. Personally I'd vote the elf mostly cause I got a bit of a pet peeve against demons, but that's just me.

[quote=@Expolar]Well with a warlock with a gimmicky pact, I can only imagine the warlock being involved with a fey entity lol

The simic hybrid druid/barbarian sounds fun as seeing how druids and barbarians can be, they can be great tanks and powerhouses if built in certain ways. And what do you "just wild all the way"? Like they have a more of a animistic behavior or more of how you plan to use the class?[/quote]

Yep. Though I think more in terms of flavor than power when I make my builds. My warlock /abjuration wizard combo is one of the few I'd make for mechanical purposes only. 

As for what meant with "wild all the way" I mean the "lived in a forest all their life" type, so yeah pretty much animalistic behavior.