[quote=Jasonhero]
This isn't a world war then. World Wars aee violent abd deadly things. I'll leave the chemical warfare and the Napalm. But rocket launchers, tanks, jets, helicopters. They stay. Cities will be taken out. Thats the effects of a world war. WMD's can stay out but I need tanks and jets and naval bombardments. Mass causlties is a fact of war. Lets have it in europe and the pacific. They always get violent anyways xD
[/quote]

Then it seems two thing have to happen:

We gotta rethink and revote and

You going against the GM Jason? :3

One thing is for sure, Harry s Truman was the ONLY president to make such a dramatic call (the use of nuclear weapons) ever since, the rules have changed. Weapons of mass destruction and chemical warfare were banned in the UK convention... Tell me if we ever carpet bombed a city in the recent 20 years and were NOT beaten about by NATO.

World war 2 is a terrible example to back up your argument. The rules have changed over the years and weapons have been restricted.

I just hate this bombing idea period and firmly stand against it still.