Now that I am back from work, I can fully respond to everyone. [quote=@Sister Sable] Aye, I want to play this one cause of the interesting focus of barbarian and companion. [/quote] OK. Just wanted to make sure. ^_^ Now I can fully look into the subclass. [quote=@Sister Sable] Ooooh, I just realized what you said... I'm a bit slow at times... Hmmm... that is a good point. Hmmm... maybe I'll do a Kenku faelock [/quote] [quote=@Sister Sable] Would fit the faewild feel, or ranger Drakewarden (would be cool if the Drake could be flavored as a griffon~?) [/quote] :lol No worries. I just want to make sure everyone has a chance in the spotlight and nobody's toes are being stepped on. ^_^ [quote=@Necroes] For what it's worth; After looking it over, the subclass seems balanced. Underpowered, if anything, by modern D&D subclass standards. The guardian-variant companion is pretty tanky and makes for a good shield, but using it to shield squishier party members limits its damage output. The offensive variant is slightly more damage than using a BA for an off hand attack, but apart from the land bound form basically making itself a flanking companion without asking, it's not especially potent. The rest of the class is just niche utility that could be covered by a Find Familiar spell. [/quote] Thank you, Necroes. ^^" [quote=@Sister Sable] I'll fill whatever role the party needs [/quote] Play what you want to play. ^_^ Again, I'm just want to make sure that nobody gets to a point where they might feel overshadowed. ^^" [quote=@rush99999] [@Sister Sable] Instead of making many posts in rapid succession, have you by any chance considered taking everything you want to say and writing it all out in one post? [/quote] [quote=@Sister Sable] I-... Sorry sir... [/quote] There's no need to apologize [@Sister Sable]. ^^" I can understand if you're nervous. As Necroes mentioned earlier, this is a slow paced game. Feel free to take as much time as you need while writing your posts. There is no pressure here. ^_^