There's plenty wrong with this logic. 

First of all, under what assertion did you submit as to Mahz's status as a person? Furthermore, the terms of human and person are used interchangeably, but not explicitly defined as such, the assumption made is that a non-human could also be a person (e.g. a corporation). 

Second, this line:
[quote=YandereNoodle]Websites must be human-made.[/quote]
Is false. Websites need not be made by humans, it's entirely possible for a website to be made from start to finish by a non-human, such as a machine, thus voiding your entire argument. 

I'll stop there, but there's more logical fallacies in this argument than what I mentioned.