[b]*Whistles*[/b] Man does time fly by when one's having fun.

Also Gat's pretty much got it nailed. But I guess I can take pot shots at some of the sillier stuff anyway.

The idea that the Gospel is more than the Bible, and can openly contradict the Bible, is hilarious nonsense. That's like saying that my headcanoning of two characters in a fictional universe is actually canon because I say so. The Bible is the one stop shopping mall for Christianity and to claim, with any kind of authority, that anything beyond the Bible is true, is just plain wrong in every aspect.

This would be like if I claimed that the Constitution also has side notes that nobody else can see which allow me to contravene any argument conveniently. Like why Guantanamo doesn't somehow violate pretty much every single thing on the Constitution.

[b]@So Boerd:[/b] The minimum amount of evidence that would be required for me to believe in God would be if there was physical evidence of his or her existence that could be verified by the scientific method. Seeing as how there is none, the claim has no evidence, and is thus tossed aside like elves and fairy god parents accordingly to my own belief system, which is belief only in the rational.

[b]@Gwazi:[/b] Don't let ActRaiser's typical personal assaults get to you. It's what he usually does when he knows he's blatantly wrong.

[b]@Kho:[/b] This whole thing sounds nice except that it still doesn't really get past the fact that God sets up an impossible test, dooms people he preprogrammed to be destined for doom, then proclaims total righteousness whilst condemning people to eternal purgatory for otherwise non-eternal crimes.

EDIT

Oh, and, yeah. No evidence for him. Whatsoever. Skepticism decrees I can't buy that.

EDIT #2

On second thought, nahh, forget the citations. Your argument isn't really all that bad, it's a different view. :lol