[quote=ActRaiserTheReturned]The burden of proof is one whomever there is more evidence against. There is yet no proof that there is more evidence against theists. If you think there is no evidence against athiests or agnostics, etcetera, then leave theists alone and let them believe what they want. Hands off their freedom of belief. Agree to disagree and be civilized.[/quote]

wut. That's not how things work. He's being quite civilized, what are you on about--

[quote=So Boerd]The burden of proof is on whomever is making the statement. I can say green swans exist. You cannot prove they don't. Therefore you can only say you don't know. By making the assertion that they don't, the burden is on you to prove it. Green swans exist is an verifiable, unfalsifiable statement. The opposite is unverifiable and falsifiable. Making a definitive statement which is unverifiable is silly, don't you think?The burden is on the atheist and the theist both. It is not on the agnostic.[/quote]

... This line of reasoning is legitimately incoherent and insane.

I am now a God because I say so. You can't disprove that. Now worship me in my newly founded church of Brovism. The one tenet is that you must wear a silly hat. Also gimmie all your monies plox or else you will go to candy-land and die over and over from cholesterol.

The burden of proof is on you to disprove it, after all!

EDIT

Also, "on a legal case" it's innocent until proven guilty. Please learn the basics of your own justice system. Thanks.