[quote][B]I am now a God because I say so. You can't disprove that. Now worship me in my newly founded church of Brovism. The one tenet is that you must wear a silly hat. Also gimmie all your monies plox or else you will go to candy-land and die over and over from cholesterol.[/B][/quote]

It's not insane if I've give you reasonable room and freedom to disprove it, like I have. 
"I am God!" Worship me!"
[URL=http://imgur.com/94W5QUq][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/94W5QUq.gif[/IMG][/URL]

::Gets back up, shoots Bison in the head::
"And thus, you are refuted!"

On the other hand, if someone says, "It's true that the Church has brought suffering and negative repercussions to society when it merges with the Government, but the Church involvement with the Government is acceptable and even beneficial to society, if it's prevented from taking involvement AS the Government." In other words, the burden is on the other side of the Debate to prove that if officials indulge in shedding positive light on their religion with statements, that it will somehow harm society through political involvement of the Church is somehow hurting our freedoms/hurting society in some way. It doesn't."