Avatar of Kalleth
  • Last Seen: 27 days ago
  • Joined: 7 yrs ago
  • Posts: 1057 (0.39 / day)
  • VMs: 1
  • Username history
    1. Kalleth 7 yrs ago
  • Latest 10 profile visitors:

Status

Recent Statuses

3 yrs ago
Current So I guess I should've watched Firefly ages ago, huh?
4 likes
7 yrs ago
Bleed over my grave, and plunge in the stake. Don't give me a break, when you're on the take.
7 yrs ago
Expanding Horizons Players! Join up with The Reapers of Castletain if you're looking for a group to join!
7 yrs ago
Swearing in other languages besides the mother tongue is ceaselessly amusing.
7 yrs ago
The Second Labour awaits, and I am ready to pursue it. FEAR NOT FELLOW GUILDMEMBERS, I SHALL BRING YOU GLORY ON THAT DAY!

Bio

I like language.

Speak to me.

And I'll tell you more.



Most Recent Posts

Banned. @Carmen Sandiego

Apparently the way we do these things now is just leave a long line of dots.

So.

................................................................................................................

@Kenshi Banned for interrupting.
Banned for calling the kettle black while displaying pot-like amounts of noir.
Just submitted something pretty experimental and off-beat, but I hope people find it interesting!
@Odin Have you finished your entry yet?
Banned for daring to theorize that happiness is real, instead of the soul-crushing sadness that permeates the nihilistic void of the endless abyss of space.
@Frizan Is the contest a no-contest then? What's up? At the very least, I'd like to get started on an entry for the next contest so if nothing's doing with this one, could we get some acknowledgement of that?

<Snipped quote by SleepingSilence>

You ought to be disqualified. You broke the rules.
You're acting self important, like you are above being critiqued after doing something as offensive as rewriting other peoples' stories the way you would have written them and labeling said revisions as better (who does that?! It's like grabbing the Mona Lisa, throwing a mustache on it and telling Da Vinci that that's how it should have looked the whole time). You give other people scathing critiques and you get one back and have the gall to say that even the reviews are wrong.

Get over yourself, bro.


Which rule was broken? Silence wasn't rewriting stories, but providing constructive criticism. Aren't you being a little bit presumptuous yourself with your comment about the Mona Lisa? I don't think any of my fellow writers are quite so self-important as to dare to think that they're a Da Vinci of writing. Personally, I live for the critiques almost more than the writing itself, for the artistic pursuit of the thing. All we can ever aspire to is to improve, and we need the critiques of others to do so. We want feedback as writers, or why bother sharing it at all?

I wouldn't call Silence's critiques of the various stories scathing. In every review, Silence went through the text and tried to give two cents on how to make the story succeed as much as possible. You'll notice if you inspect each review, while there are things that Silence would remove, would change, every review included comments about aspects of the story that worked well. Please give an example of what you are referring to as scathing, because reviews that only provide positive feedback are just as unhelpful as ones that give only negative feedback, but I wouldn't say those reviews were either.

Get over yourself? You didn't submit an entry, haven't provided your own reviews, critiques, or votes for any of the stories. Where is this coming from? That isn't to say that you can't comment on whatever you like but I just fail to see why you feel it necessary to disqualify somebody who has no apparent involvement with you.

Lastly, I think it's a tad dishonest to quote out of context the portions of Silence's rebuttal where the use of profanity has been prefaced by an exhaustive elaboration and substantive argument behind the frustration expressed. To reiterate what I said before, given these comments are specifically addressed in response to a critique by somebody else, I don't understand why you feel it necessary to throw your hat into the ring. It's not exactly your place to decide such things, and if you have substantive proof, I would love to see you provide some for Frizan, whose job it is to judge on these matters.

Which rule was broken?
What part of / which review was/were scathing?
Why do you care?

EDIT: And, in the intervening time it took me to respond, it appears that the person to whom the comments were addressed has replied. Civilly, and in a way which allows us all to move on. Disregard what I've said above please, if only because it's not worth the energy to bother with now.



Hi there. I'm interested. I figured this was a very "Eitrigg" thing to do, so I'm just going to leave this here. Really fascinated with this RP, even though I'm kind of a Cyberpunk noob. Hope it's maybe to your liking, and that this RP isn't dead, and that you may deign to have me along for the ride? Cheers!




© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet