Avatar of Kratesis
  • Last Seen: 24 days ago
  • Joined: 10 yrs ago
  • Posts: 268 (0.07 / day)
  • VMs: 1
  • Username history
    1. Kratesis 10 yrs ago
  • Latest 10 profile visitors:

Status

Recent Statuses

6 yrs ago
Current The original 'Throw it on the ground.'
4 likes
6 yrs ago
Good luck Tuck.
2 likes
6 yrs ago
When a thread gets locked while I'm in the midst of typing my retort: 3.bp.blogspot.com/-rwro8doo…
3 likes
7 yrs ago
Stone Dragon: Kult of Athena's selection is as good as their website is bad. You can even get an Albion from them though you'll have to wait a year or so.
1 like
7 yrs ago
A Pepsi huh. Have you considered bringing peace to the middle east?
1 like

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

@Dynamo Frokane

I'm sure you'd like that
I have to disagree with my fellow conservatives in regards to climate change. It is both real and the result of human activity.
This is not mine but it was requested to be put forward. I certainly feel it is about as close to truth as a green text post can be whilst still remaining a form of entertainment.



For all sad words of tongue and pen, The saddest are these, '/pol/ was right again'.
@Silver Carrot In many ways I would agree.
@Silver Carrot 4chan must be a time machine lol.

@The Harbinger of Ferocity

I believe their domain is largely in Spam


They're rousing the proletariat against us.
Yeah we've had actual communists in this thread before. Have we had Nazis yet? They're all over /pol/ right now but I'm not sure if they've spread yet.

(What ever happened to the communist guys anyway?)
Don't like the licence requirements in Cali? Practice somewhere else.


This is a law that you can be imprisoned for violating. Imprisoning people for a disagreement over pronouns is an unjust use of the powers of government. No one should be force to uproot their life and move to another state or face almost a year of imprisonment because they express disagreement with a client.

I thought jail for smoking weed was bad enough but now we have jail for pronouns.
@Penny

Now assume that you had a male nurse whose co-workers consistently called him by a female name (not his own). He has made it clear that this is unwelcome and offensive. He has asked them to stop and they continue to do so.


What you have described is man whose colleagues are jerks, not a title seven violation. They may or may not be in violation of a company policy but the law requires unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, or other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature for a given behavior to qualify as sexual harassment.

Furthermore the situations being compared are not the same. In the example you give a man is bullied by his colleagues, who address him with a name that is not his. But that is different than a situation where one individual makes a claim (that they are a certain gender) and those around them do not believe their claim and elect to not behave as if it is true.

That is clear cut workplace bullying and sexual harassment and practically any HR officer would agree with that.


The opinions of a human resources department are not relevant.

...other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature that tends to create a hostile or offensive work environment.


(I assume this is a reply to me? If not please disregard this message with my apologizes.)

That doesn't answer why refusal to use the pronouns that someone prefers is sexual harassment. (The italicized line is also tailored to the maintenance of a productive work environment, not a legal system of crime and punishment.)

Why is vocalizing your disagreement with an individuals claims about their gender sexual harassment?
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet