Avatar of TheMadAsshatter
  • Last Seen: 2 yrs ago
  • Joined: 10 yrs ago
  • Posts: 1214 (0.32 / day)
  • VMs: 1
  • Username history
    1. TheMadAsshatter 10 yrs ago

Status

Recent Statuses

4 yrs ago
Current You could not live with your own failure. And where did that bring you? Back to RPG.
5 yrs ago
I've been away for so long. Holy shit.
2 likes
6 yrs ago
I'm done with Guam. I want to get back home, buy an 80s Japanese sports car, and get to tuning.
2 likes
7 yrs ago
Motorcycle is finally street legal. Now I can finally live.
1 like
8 yrs ago
I'M BACK, BABY!
1 like

Bio

Test bio, please ignore.

Most Recent Posts

Interesting little thought experiment. I'm going to go ahead and throw my choices into the conversation.

Safe:

Father Mark
Good physical condition, farming background, and religion can help keep people together. But mostly the farming background is the biggest reason he's staying.

Dr. Rita
On top of being immediately necessary because she's literally a doctor, she can train others, which will probably be a necessity given her declining health. Not to mention her impending death will free up more space for additional people down the line.

Mr. White
Only keeping him because Dr. Rita, in all likelihood, isn't long for this world, and she needs a protege. Being a med student makes him a perfect candidate, but he needs to shelve his political ideals or we'll find another knowledgeable and receptive person for the job.

Mrs. Anthony
I'm not too concerned about her population growth ideals. Not after the apocalypse. Electrical knowledge only has limited practical use in a post-apocalyptic society, but it can nonetheless improve quality of life for everyone else, and happy workers are productive workers.

Mr. Clark
This guy needs to watch his mouth if he wants to stay, since medical skill is slightly more immediately useful than being a handyman, and his political bullshit will put him at odds with our future medic. Anyone can take shit apart to figure out how they work, but you can't (ethically) take people apart to gain medical knowledge. Same goes for construction; basic structures can be built through a little bit of trial and error.

Dr. Scott
Good all-rounder, but the word "doctor" don't mean shit unless it's in something that's actually practical in a SHTF scenario. But, he is a botanist, which will help with farming.

Billy Scott
A gamble, but regardless of whether his mental state can improve, he can be a valuable worker, and not really a lot else, but also not a significant liability. Learning disability =/= mental instability, so he's fine for now.

Exiled:

Ms. Perez
Grab a handful of supplies and GTFO. You bring nothing special to the table and potentially have life-altering or terminal diseases. Nothing wrong with sex, but the medical gamble that presents means I'd only take if you had something else going for you.

Michael Perez
Straight up liability for at least a decade, but deserves a shot, which is why I'm leaving him with his mom. Best of luck.

Mrs. Scott
Family values be damned. You are literally the least useful person (most of the others seem mentally healthy) and the second biggest liability in the group (obese and a diabetic; likely not long for this world without meds). Get lost!

Self-Insert:

Angry Hat-Man: 22, white, atheist, intelligent, military experience, IT and comms training, jack-of-all-trades, healthy
I'd put myself right between Mr. White and Mrs. Anthony. Anyone with military experience immediately gets a slot, for several reasons. Anyone who is or was in has to be within certain bounds of health, both mental and physical. Plus, even outside of their specific job training, I can attest that pretty much everyone gets some form of basic weapons, first aid, and survival training, among various other useful pieces of information. If nothing else, you have a trained, healthy, and (reasonably) disciplined worker, and typically some limited amount of leadership potential.

Discussion:

Really, the only people I were going back and forth on were the Scotts. I was really torn between kicking out just one or two of them, and I took about ten minutes thinking about it to come to this point. Honestly, the biggest problem really was Ms. Scott. As much as a psychologist may be needed, an actual doctor is more necessary, and the medical liability far outweighed any usefulness she may have presented.

I felt bad kicking out Ms. Perez and her baby, but having to raise a child for years outweighs the benefit of having a really young child who can be easily raised. If he were at least 5 or so, this would have been a much harder decision to make. As for Ms. Perez, I pretty much stand by what I said. The potential for her to have contracted an STD pretty much put her out of the race, and I don't like the idea of splitting her and her baby up.

As for the ones I kept, I put the other Scotts near the bottom, since they could probably strike out on their own and have a reasonably okay shot at surviving. Mr Clark is racially motivated and would be all too likely to clash with some of the others, and of everything, basic construction work is something that can be learned with fairly little difficulty. Pretty much anyone with any concept of physics can put together some form of basic shelter.

As for Mrs. Anthony, electrical knowledge is good, but humans got by without electricity for a long fucking time. However, while it can be done again, it would be rough, so anything to keep morale up is welcome. Plus, if we're talking long-term survival, baby-making has to happen and she's the one for the job. But then you ask, why not keep Michael? Because we didn't have space at the moment and cuts had to be made somewhere. And, like I already mentioned, I don't like the idea of splitting him from his only family.

All of the others were pretty much no-brainers to me. We need medics, and we need a farmer. Father Mark, Dr. Rita, and Mr. White were all valuable assets in my head, though I was a little bit hesitant to pick up Mr. White in a hurry, due to his political leanings, but he can get over it. Hopefully.

If we're talking really long-term... I tend not to think that far ahead, since circumstances can change any long-term outlook in a heartbeat.
@mdk No joke. I can legit name (first and last name) 5 people who I went to high school with whom I would bet more money that they knew how to get weed than they would actually charge for it.

Sorry, get back on topic, jeez guys!
<Snipped quote by catchamber>

True... Kanye considered even running for president... :(


Sad thing is people would actually vote for him, and I think he'd actually win. I swear to god, the last two elections I've been cognizant enough to really understand both felt like popularity contests. If Kanye-Dickhead seriously ran for president, I'd be seriously scared that he'd actually win. He'd win liberals over for the same reason Trump won conservatives over. He's an outsider, though arguably more dangerous than Trump because beyond having no basis in politics, he also has no real basis in economics or business. His advisers would have to be the best in their fields to keep him from making some really stupid fucking decisions.
Reminds me of when we stayed at one of the Disney resorts and my brother and I wanted to watch something on Netflix so we had to literally go down to the pool for the laptop wifi to even work consistently.


Hahaha, sounds about right.
It's slightly shittier in this hotel. Not sure why, but it feels like my hit-registration in pretty much every online videogame is worse since getting to this hotel.
Bruuuuhhhh. Seriously?
@Altered Tundra Originally, I wasn't really digging it, but I liked the song more and more as it went on. I found the lyrics very relatable, and the video helped me append more meaning to it. I really liked that part, but I found the instrumentals very overwhelming, and the way they were mixed made it sound really flat. I think this song would have benefited from a more solemn approach to it than that mishmash of sounds and distortion effects, not to mention how much they drowned out the vocals. I almost couldn't understand what he was saying, and really, the instrumentals in general dragged the whole thing down in my opinion, but I'll take it for what it is. 6.8/10 (with the stipulation that better instrumentals would have brought it up a whole point).

I happened across this song while perusing the Night in the Woods subreddit (fantastic fucking game, by the way), and this song not only captures the feel of the game pretty well, but is also animated by the lead artist for the game. If you know the game I'm talking about, you'll immediately recognize the art style.

So all I can say of the song is it has sort of a post-hardcore/alt/indie rock feel to it. I actually remember the music video pretty clearly. It's all animated in a simplistic way, and it starts off with this blue/green background and zooms in on a turtle shell. The turtle comes out of the shell and starts walking, then a meteor comes and blows the turtle to pieces. On the pieces, there's people (drawn as stick figures IIRC) and houses and shit (all very simplistic), and they're all doing whatever. At certain parts it changes to just show a silhouette of a person singing along to the lyrics of the song. Around the last verse, the turtle comes back together (still alive, no blood or anything like that) and just gets back in it's shell. It's weird and abstract, but yeah that's about it. Also, I'm 98% sure someone said the band was from Europe. Somewhere Northeastern if I recall correctly. Finnish, maybe. It was sung in English, though.

.....

So, back to your actual song, going into it, I was concerned that it was just going to be that tense violin buildup with nothing but those hard hitting beats after that. And then the singer came in, and I was like "Ahh, okay, this is the actual song." Still though, those hard stings were useless. And then in the interlude between the second and third verse they were distracting. I wonder if there's actually supposed to be some creative artistic value to it or if it was just noise. Either way, I don't understand why they were used at all. They just sounded cheesy and honestly, the whole song loses a full point just for that. I get that sometimes musicians experiment with shit, and sometimes that shit fails.

As for the rest of the song... (listens to it again). It was... okay. The chorus felt generic (and suffered from sudden-needless-tempo-change-itis, my least favorite musical element), but I did enjoy the overall instrumental composition of the rest of the song (not counting the back-to-back stings), but I really wasn't a big fan of the overall melody. It seemed really devoid of range, first of all. The lyrics were okay, but forgettable. Most importantly, it feels like the artist just took ascending and descending chord progressions and made the occasional tweak here and there. I'll trust your judgment that this is one of your favorite "hit or miss" artists, but this song was a miss, IMO. 5/10.

Haven't brought up any of my ambient post-rock shit in awhile, so here you go.

@River Goblin First thing that came to mind when I saw your photo:



@Dread We're not. Just bored and waiting for the shit to be over with. I just saw an opportunity and took it.
Taken a few months ago during squadron photos on our jet.

© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet