• Last Seen: MIA
  • Joined: 12 yrs ago
  • Posts: 1074 (0.24 / day)
  • VMs: 0
  • Username history
    1. AegonVI 12 yrs ago

Status

User has no status, yet

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

Rare said
Okay, what the fuck is going on with the orders? Do I need to remake my?


This turn is fine and settled out.
Understood!! I would suggest adding that into the OP.
What?
Pepperm1nts said
It took me a bit to look up the article, read it, and quote it.


Ah, gotcha. Well a ninja got to you while you were reading(;
I'm obviously too fast a ninja for you to do that to
Pepper, you got ninja'd by, like, three minutes.
Dutchbag said
So don't act like I have seen them.


I'm not. I'm petitioning for them to have some effect, particularly because the assassination is next year anyways. My concern is mostly addressed to the GM of the game (Chairman Stein) as he has final say.
Dutchbag said
I haven't seen your orders.Also, I smell metagaming.


That's because we were supposed to send them to Stein!!!

And he actually had an aide who wanted him to increase his security detail because he like going to meet the people a lot and the aide was worried he would be shot.
Dutchbag said
Good question. Glad you asked. For natural deaths or deaths in accidents, I will stick with OTL times of death. Assassinations may be averted in case certain conditions aren't met. That said, Umberto I, Victoria, and McKinley are done for.


Why?!?!!?!!???? I spent an order to increase presidential security! I thought it was up to rolls! That's what you've been telling me up until now at least!!!

Dutchbag said
That's going to happen regardless since we haven't changed anything before 1900. However, your game decisions influence the following elections. That said, I'm shit at US history so don't expect the most fluent alternate history.


Except the election of 1900 happened in November of 1900, so it would be subject to change.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet