Shy said
Also if pokeballs are for pokemon why the hell can you find pokeballs with items in them or even other pokeballs?
There's a theory that the pokeball belongs to a dead pokemon and the item is whatever they were holding when they died.
Shy said
Also if pokeballs are for pokemon why the hell can you find pokeballs with items in them or even other pokeballs?
Magic Magnum said
Reason these were late.My last response for Primez was almost immediately after his post.However, when I went to send it the Guild crashed so I went back left the post waiting to be sent again for when it was back up.Got distracted with playing Rust so when I finally did notice the Guild was back up (hours later) I just immediately posted the reply, not bothering to read the other posts until I got off of rust (which is now).Both try to give answers to the world, the reason we exist etc.Science has yet to find proof of religion, so they don't except it as something that should be taught to people as fact when there's also a scientific explanation for it.Closest you can get is "Science is right, but guided by God's hand". But even then, there's still the claim God exists that needs to be proven first. And with most religions you can open their Bible and find something in it that would argue against Science.So in another words, they're two different and conflicting answers for the same thing.Also, if you need religion to have morals... That says a lot about your character.Atheists also have morals, religion is not needed in the slightest to have them.Also depending on what religion you look at those morals would allow/approve the killing of towns, the kidnapping and raping of virgin women, slavery etc.And to state "That's misinterpreting the Bible" is dodging a bullet and known as a logical fallacy.Science doesn't claim there's nothing out there.In fact in claims there is quite a ton out there, we just don't really know what exactly to expect once we're there yet.Unless if you mean Religion, in which case it depends on the Religion.And although you can't prove or disprove a deity, something still does need to be proven before it can properly be treated as fact.Normally I would of.But recently when conversations here have happen comparing spam to OT people have claimed that spam is capable of just as serious and intelligent if not more so than OT is.So I figure why not put that to the test?Note: I'm not purposely trying to start these discussions here. I'm just not shying down from them if they do so happen to appear.
Asuras said
Slim and just-above-average height. I like the types of girls who don't necessarily have the build to appear "tough", but nevertheless look like they could hurt you if they wanted to. To summarize it, really, I guess you could say a mix of "girl next door" and "tomboy".I also tend to define women's faces into three different categories: cute, beautiful, and sexy. I prefer faces who are a mix of cute and beautiful. Unfathomably long hair is also a plus, but shorter (albeit still long) ponytails are just as good looking.
Kill Bones said
you're just saying that to get your dick wet
Kill Bones said
im not pretty tho :c :c :C
Smiral said
let's have a compliment fight
Awson said
Put the fishing pole down, Noogle. You're pretty.
Smiral said
Your face isn't chubby, you face is rly pretty stop it