" If any Religious person is reading this, please answer this question: If you found out your God didn't exist, would you now go out raping and murdering people? If not then you just proved that you don't need Religion to be a moral human being."
Double logical fallacy right there. Using an extreme example then presuming your opponent's answer, answering in advance, and proclaiming victory before any discussion could even occur.
This is as bad as asking an atheist if they would go raping people if the law suddenly allowed it tomorrow, then using evidence of that to prove that laws against rape are unnecessary and declaring victory. It's a broken question in two painfully obvious aspecs, Gwazi.
