Azarthes said
You're not even my real momYou can't tell me what to do
I didn't even know I was your fake mum. Wow, I'm a shitty parent.
Raxacoricofallapatorius said
See what you did deer
Halo Member
- Last Seen: 7 yrs ago
- Old Guild Username: HaloAssault
- Joined: 12 yrs ago
- Posts: 1979 (0.44 / day)
- VMs: 1
-
Username history
- Halo 12 yrs ago
Status
User has no status, yet
Bio
PLEASE NOTICE ME HANK-SENPAI
Most Recent Posts
I didn't even know I was your fake mum. Wow, I'm a shitty parent.
As I understand it, chickens have been genetically modified so that they lay mostly female eggs. The chickens laying eggs and the chickens we eat in supermarkets are all female. Cocks are comparatively rare, and are mostly for breeding purposes, as their meat tends to be inferior (and no, it wasn't just cold) and they're more aggressive.
Azarthes said
Yes I'm in thecali swag district
You changed your sig. You can't use the word swag anymore. Boo.
Uhm. No. Please read the article, dude. A public audience vote at a single debate doesn't reinstate Pluto as a planet.
I rather doubt they'll reinstate it arbitrarily. They have defined what a planet is, now, and until there's a reason to change that definition they won't. As was said in the article, we don't really have enough evidence to construct an accurate definition of "planet", yet - so they'll keep the current definition, the one that excludes Pluto, until there is.
It's actually a very interesting issue, though. Not because of Pluto or even because of planets/space/astrophysics/whatever, but because of the universally applicable problem: how do we scientifically define things, and, thus, categorise them? How unique does a category have to be? And so on. It strikes right at the way we conduct scientific research.
I rather doubt they'll reinstate it arbitrarily. They have defined what a planet is, now, and until there's a reason to change that definition they won't. As was said in the article, we don't really have enough evidence to construct an accurate definition of "planet", yet - so they'll keep the current definition, the one that excludes Pluto, until there is.
It's actually a very interesting issue, though. Not because of Pluto or even because of planets/space/astrophysics/whatever, but because of the universally applicable problem: how do we scientifically define things, and, thus, categorise them? How unique does a category have to be? And so on. It strikes right at the way we conduct scientific research.
Azarthes said
Guess ur gonna have to fly out
brbplanetickets
I actually desperately want to go to the US again. California (where you live, no?) being one place in particular I'd like to see. I promise not to make a mess.
Raxacoricofallapatorius said
Go kill a deer. Do it.
Bambi's mum doe
Azarthes said
What about Elliot He was fun when he graced me with his presence
Excellent, a thing I don't know (or, possibly, have forgotten). I'm officially not a true oldfag.
Also, on-topic: love the way you wrote that, Captain. Looking forward to reading more!
I love jerky, and I never get it. So actually yes, I'd love your meat in my mouth. Give it to me.
Who knows how literally it'll be taken; it might just be "inspired" by Tetris the same way The Maze Runner is "inspired" by that game thing mdk posted. Let's hope, anyway.
Goddamnit Scribz xD
scribz said
"Sudoko the movie! . Coming to cinema's near you. "
Goddamnit Scribz xD
Azarthes said
Will I get to see my faithful dog dlayethSo many oldfag in jokes to gettoo
The fact that I get some of them and know who these people are worries me a little. I think I'm going through my "midlife crisis" in terms of oldfaggotry.
I liked Pally, though at least partly only because to dislike him would be hypocrisy of the highest order from me 
© 2007-2026