• Last Seen: 11 yrs ago
  • Joined: 12 yrs ago
  • Posts: 2579 (0.58 / day)
  • VMs: 0
  • Username history
    1. So Boerd 12 yrs ago

Status

User has no status, yet

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

I have no objection with implementing it now, but I propose we expand it to include hostile diplomatic moves.
Pasta Sentient said
What about Spain? That's essentially what Spain did?Did the Dutch fight any battles during the war of the 8th coalition? I'm not accusing just curious.


You are mostly to blame for the Spanish passivity.
I think restriction to only improving military quality and quantity is sufficient. If someone was kicking back, he'd call them out.
Absolutely I would not.
Outcast wouldn't allow Mexico to do that. I wouldn't be allowed to DOW China were it not for my alliance with Russia.
Outcast has to keep it close to the vest because there is no interest. If there was interest, then default would simply be when you income was less than debt maintenancen
Only if, Dannaroo, you didn't say to spread the ships over multiple years.
Speaking from one of the naval arms racers, I am not limited by orders, but money.
And I was right in Trayvon Martin's case.

I am not 100% sure, as a matter of fact, I used the word "preponderance", which means 51%.

I sided with Wilson because of Occam's razor, that being the simplest solution tends to be correct. Wilson's version of events requires significantly less suspension of belief.

Difficult to believe elements of Wilson's story:

~Unarmed kid assaults armed officer. Which isn't that difficult to believe.

Difficult to believe elements of the "Wilson=murder" side:

~Racist cop leaves witness.
~Racist cop kills in broad daylight
~Cop can't shoot for anything, when he is uninjured and can take as much time to aim as he wants, or get closer.
~Kid who just commits robbery and is walking down the street doesn't get off the street when told to by a cop for no reason, rather than he fears impending arrest.
~Al Sharpton is correct on anything.
Judging from my two minutes of research, which was all I could spare on it, I have reached several conclusions, of which all but the last are probably wrong/misguided.

1. The allegation that supporters just want to sleep with her is untrue (hopefully). I have mistaken better looking women for men in my peripheral vision. She's less "Marilyn Monroe" and more "Marilyn Manson".
2. Feminists rallying to her is stupid.
3. This is extraordinarily trivial. It is almost noteworthy how trivial this is, to be getting so much attention.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet