• Last Seen: 11 yrs ago
  • Joined: 12 yrs ago
  • Posts: 2579 (0.58 / day)
  • VMs: 0
  • Username history
    1. So Boerd 12 yrs ago

Status

User has no status, yet

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

I am an experienced Rekka No Ken (Fire emblem GBA) veteran, so I set up my team like that. New classes threw me for a loop, and I am not a fan of this whole reclass system but I will get by.
Anyway, I disagree with Act strongly, don't lose my points in his energy.

Nobody has been able to prove ipso facto why a generic religious moral system is so inferior to a secular one that it should be ignored when a religious person goes to vote.
Gat said
Like the vaunted evidence you provide when making your (at times) laughable assertions?


Ask and ye shall recieve evidence.
gamer5 said
Knowing how to write (and read) is being literate - and the Church did their best to keep the secrets of writing and reading to themselves for a long period of time.Most of the things I know from Wikipedia, ordinary encyclopedia and history books. All can be checked on Wikipedia.I doubt that anyone here is attacking religion - hell I care if you believe in God or that cows are sacred animals - all we ask is that you don't bring any religious beliefs into government(s). Is that to much to ask?


You must be new here. Your assertion, your evidence.

Anyway, yes, that is too much to ask. You are basically asking me to check my morality at the door. Why is yours any better?
At any rate, this discussion is moot. Nobody is talking about giving religion the force of government. I just want Christmas trees in public parks and memorial crosses to be ok in cemeteries and voluntary public prayer and menorahs during hannukah and whatever else people want that is reasobable
I am sorry, could you go ahead and provide a direct quotation from me where I said religion invented writing? Because what I said was "gave an incentive to become literate" but clearly I was mistaken about what I said. A quote would be helpful.

But I will need source for every other assertion you made in that post, gamer, except the great library/academia bit and the Roman/Latin bit.
Ok, here is my tentative build, team. Tell me if this is viable before I commit.

Sell Void Seal for 5k

Lord (Axe)
Mercenary
Monk
Cavalier
Troubadour

Is it bad that I subconsciously built it like a League of Legends team? Just now realized lol.

Lord-AD Carry
Mercenary-Top/tank
Monk-Burster mid
Troubador-Support
Cavalier-Jungle
ActRaiserTheReturned said
Hellenism is bad kay? As is ancient Greco-Roman Culture. It's not a miracle that civilization's foundations for later orders came from the Greeks and Romans, it's a miracle that they weren't all somehow mentally retarded by the time they died with some of their cultural attitudes and norms. Seriously. One of the most brilliant cultures in all of history, didn't have a word for the English equilavent of "humble". These are the two cultures that revolutionized hygiene, philosophy, medicine and music, law and order, etcetera. This is also the same culture that worshiped statues with fertility goddesses who had rows and rows of marble tits. (Not that different from other cultures, but bare with me), had established usury, (look it up), drunken orgies, littered their streets with abandoned children, where creeping horrors from the anus of Humanity could pick up and do God knows what with them. Spartans legalized the murder of Helots. You had to murder a Human being in order to become a Spartan warrior. Yes you were punished harshly if you were caught, but if you got away with it, you were golden. Despite revisionist nonsense to the contrary, Spartans liked to molest younger men. The idea was to groom other soldiers as "lovers" so they would fight for each other on the field of battle that much harder. -_-Celts and maybe even Germans had a good point in hating Roman culture, despite early interactions with the Romans. There was plenty to admire and respect about Romans, like the rule of law, and to an extent, something of a half-assed peace. Hygiene, medicine, etcetera, things I already mentioned. Even then, if you were a vaunted Roman soldier, if you so much as got out of line but charging in battle before you were given the order, they cut your junk off. (Maybe testicles to, I don't remember). Oh, did I mention they experiment with surgery on prisoners? Of course Western Europeans also had bad, maybe even to an extent, worse ethics than Romans. Now you are probably going to ask, "What does this have to do with writing?" Well, my point is that while I get your point in that the Western European Pagans could have adapted writing from their Eastern "neighbors", there wold have been a religious emphasis on resisting change. Keeping traditions mostly or totally oral was a religious matter, not a matter of pragmatism. It's kind of like some people in the days of the old Arabic Empires and Middle Eastern powers looking down on coffee houses. They would see something morally wrong with such a thing, as absurd as it sounds to us. It could take at least a hundred, two hundred or more years before the West would adopt the Eastern cultures enough to replicate the same thing that had happened in real world history.


^this. The oral traditions of the Norse, the last germanic pagans. They did not write down their religious beliefs until they were allegedly christianized and couldn't rely on memorization and oral tradition any more. They were happy to never write the prose and poetic Eddas until they had to.
Magic Magnum said
Once again ignoring our arguments completely.There is far more to Religion than Christmas trees.If you don't understand that you eithera) Know nothing about Religionb) Are a terrible trollEither way I'm now done debating this until you actually start addressing the arguments being made rather than what arguments you want us to be making.


There isn't more than Christmas trees and prayers in what I am proposing. Not sure what you are arguing against
"In that case, over a billion people have died in the name of one religion or another, due to anything from the Salem witch trials to improper medical practices based on faith healing to anyone claiming divine inspiration or divine authority starting a war for any reason. This includes Hitler, just so you know."

Like hell. If you think Hitler did what he did for religion and not for his moronic racial ideology, you're out of your mind. Gonna need a source for that number. You assume that in the absence of religion these wars would have never happened. Remember, church and state were the same. How much was done in the name of the church by the state, and how often was what the state wanted what the religion subsequently endorsed? Like the Franco-Ottoman alliance or Carolingian attempts to make an alliance with the Abbasids. The secular government dictated to religion, RARELY vice versa, and when that did happen, it was the pope maintaining his secular power.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet