Tempest said
It's objective morality. They exist because they must, because that is part of being a sentient race that must share the same world. There is no true written rule. It is based upon the consensus of humanity itself. Do people have the right to life? To be happy? To make their own choices? I am not saying hand things to everyone. Surely that does nothing but encourage those who simply would live their lives expecting everything to be handed to them out of some delusion of entitlement. But, simply, this is a matter that everyone ought be able to live their lives as they see fit and no other person has the right to infringe upon that unless it infringes upon another individual's first. *nods*Perhaps I am an idealist in this. Surely, there are other cultures, both in history and now that go against it. But this the end goal of all peoples. True, there are things that will get in the way. Religion, telling a people that those who live a particular way are sinful. A government, that tells people that they cannot. Yet, in the end what people do is ultimately their choice. If it presents a harm to others? Step in, sure. If it is a matter that brings grievance onto another? Step in. If it is simply one person's choice that in no way can harm another person? Then just let them be. Shit isn't as complicated as it sounds. Its when people's OWN feelings about what others are doing, or some stupid belief to entitlement that is fueling this call to action? Back off, go do something more productive in your life than telling someone else they are wrong because they didn't find validation and reason for their life the same way you did.
Beta said
Beta said
People that offer to help or tell me to get help... usually end up needing help just as much as me.
Beta said
Texbook failcounter to being called out on poorly defending one's argument.-742/10