Avatar of ASTA
  • Last Seen: 2 yrs ago
  • Old Guild Username: Lum
  • Joined: 12 yrs ago
  • Posts: 1172 (0.26 / day)
  • VMs: 0
  • Username history
    1. ASTA 12 yrs ago

Status

User has no status, yet

Bio

Do your ears work?

Most Recent Posts

LeeRoy said
I'm sorry I exposed my bones to the air and don't want to type that much. :U


Ow.
I vote for Total Anarchy.
3 people to review characters.

Why not just pick one?
HazmatMedic said
That reminds me - how do people want the combat system to go?I know the honour system is good, but it only works when you can trust one side to back down. Sometimes, two sides just seem too evenly matched to get a clear winner.


If people use their brains, this shouldn't be an issue.
WIP
That's because the MLP fandom itself is beyond terrible.
TheSovereignGrave said
Take a bird from the West Coast of America and a related species from Europe and I can guarantee you that they won't understand each other.


This same exact thing applies to humans, honestly. You can't take someone who doesn't know a lick of English and fling them into the state of Texas and really expect them to fair well without extensive assistance from a third-party. You could say that utilizing computer programs to help communicate is one method of getting things done, but I doubt modern electronic translation software (which is rather pathetic, mind you) has information on the 2,000 or so languages used by the human race.

Also, pretty sure dolphins have been said to have their own language. Body language could also count.
WIP
ImportantNobody said
Larger animals would normally be stronger because they'd need larger muscles to support their weight and they'd also have more momentum if moving at the same speed.


True.
Vordak said
Just making sure - increasing the thickness of muscle is what makes one stronger, not the overall mass?Also, square cube law and all that jazz applied, a being wouldn't greatly benefit from growing in height - BUT with longer limbs it would have a longer lever to swing, and stronger-than-human muscles would compensate for the volume increase, actualy making such growth efficient, right?


Strength is a little...funny when it comes to various animals native to our world.

For example, a Silverback Gorilla, on average, is shorter than your run-of-the-mill human male (mostly because this particular species of animal is quasi-bipedal, moving about on land via knuckle-walking, so true bipedal locomotion isn't needed for them). The gorilla's immense physical strength comes from its refined arm muscles; it's a top-heavy creature, and requires all of that physical power to swing its hefty mass from tree to tree. It's a factor in a lot of creatures, but automatically coming to the assumption that a tall creature is an immensely strong one is kind of odd when I think about it.

A lot of factors are thrown into calculating muscle power, like how the organism's skeleton is structured, what type of muscle the creature specializes in (either in slow-twitch muscle fibers or fast-twitch muscle fibers), the creature's metabolic rate, how tightly-woven the muscle fibers are, and more. You might even run into an animal that suffers from an unusual condition that causes its body to pack on more muscle than it should, like in the incredibly rare cases where some humans are born with myostatin-related muscle hypertrophy.

It's basically superhuman strength, caused by your body's low sensitivity to myostatin, a protein that restricts muscle growth. Very odd mutation, honestly. What's weird is that, as far as doctors know, it doesn't come with any real risks to the one affected by it.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet