Derpestein

^>V

^ Hey bby I didn't kno u wer humu
> mai shrock gttin herdd
V hhnnnngggg

Ban The User Above You!

Banned for thinking my laws can't bind you.

Ban The User Above You!

Banned for treason.

Is spam dying

idlehands said
There's an initiation that involves goldfish, olive oil, and cardboard tampons.

Wasn't there foam darts, jelly and noodles too?

Jumping Head-First

Lambda said
More to the effect that I don't care about seeming like a jackass. But if you don't want to actually look at a post before you reply to it, I can't make you.

I did look at the post, mr. Eyeball. Besides, that doesn't make you a jackass at all. Lazy ducks who aren't bothered to put a paragraph or two in casual are lazy and should go back to free. Like, me!

And to prove I am indeed not blind:
'I can't help but agree that lazy fucks shouldn't be in the casual section, but I don't want to be a jackass. Then again, I don't really care.'

Kaga said
Well then wouldn't you be able to easily adjust to the expected post length in any section, since in, say, casual, you'd have more material to base a post off of?I notice myself conforming to the average post length of other members all the time. It's one of the many reasons why I generally don't care at all what section I RP in. I just join whatever has a nice-looking premise.

Probably, yes.

^>V

^ Butter is love, butter is life.
> Is shrek
V is in my swamp

otagi bank and the new companions

Will make an Otogi bank char shortly.

Jumping Head-First

Lambda said
I can't help but agree that lazy fucks shouldn't be in the casual section, but I don't want to be a jackass. Then again, I don't really care.

I'm infected by lazy fuckery by other lazy fucks when I went to free.

One sentence post leads to another one sentence post because there isn't much to react to from the other poster, then the next guy posts a one sentence post because they didn't get much to react to from the previous guy, etc, etc. Until the RP dies.

...

Back to casual!

Let's B!tch. I feel it's a healthy release for our annoyances.

Darkraven said
Believe it or not, that's what got me to leave an RP that I'd been with for a year or two, Derpestein. Guess what it's about? It's because some jackass decided that he can't accept a bolt of flame that goes straight. He said it needed to fall within 10-20 metres. What's worse is that that's not the only thing he argued about. He didn't want it to have a blast-back effect, and he didn't want it to kill his character within seconds. Guess who won? He did, because he's closer to the GM than I am.

Roose Hurro said
Ouch...For me, I was involved in this really excellent RP from way back (on one of the first sites I started RPing on) all about the survivors of a ship crash, a group of volunteer soldiers sent to this "Fortress" world only to have their ship "hit" something... well, to make a long story short, the GM godmodded his own thread, and killed it. Made the enemy undefeatable, able to "regenerate" from any damage, even their destroyed weapons regenerating with them. Never gave our group a chance to rest, either, let alone survive, so everyone quit. It was either that, or have all our characters killed, as they would have in any such "real life" situation of that hopeless nature.One situation in which sticking to "realism" in a fantasy/sci-fi setting would logically lead to death of all player characters, but also a situation in which the players really had no choice, I'd say. So yes, "realism" can and does kill RPs. Whether for one player or all.

Fucking hell.

Realism, unless it's meant to be a hyper realistic RP, should NEVER be called upon to that extent.

In your case Dark, bias, the dude was an idiot and the GM was a biased dipshit.

Your case, Roose...GM tried to make it challenging and ended up with it being way too difficult.

Jumping Head-First

idlehands said
Are you surprised? Go back to casual, you lazy fuck. One sentence RPs are for grade school kids.

No, I'm not surprised. But I am indeed a lazy fuck. One sentence RP's are great, for lazy fucks.