Drakel

By popular demand:

48. What is Nat's greatest contribution to spam?
52. Why would anyone fuck with a drunken Irish man with a banhammer?
54. Who wants to rap battle?
55. If the next 'Nice Guy' Killer was a spam member, who would it be and why?
56. When will we get to see our post counts?
58. How the fuck do you get pi anyway?
59. Why does Drakel have the audacity to list himself above Jorick in intelligence?
60. Would you participate in a spam orgy? How would that go?
62. So, Drakel. What's it like to be the circlejerk's custarddump?
63. Can I ask a question?

@48 The Pointless Thread.
@52 I don't know. A drunk Irish man with a banhammer is scary enough for the members who never did anything to begin with. Why fuck with him indeed?
@54 Sounds like a fun idea, even if I'm no good. :)
@55 I think Joe would make it. He's been called so much shit that it'd make sense that he'd be on the hunt to kill the other spammers. Either Joe, or Nat.
@56 Soon I hope. I miss them almost as much as I missed view counts.
@59 If you have something to say I'd prefer you actually say it publicly. Also because I fucking can. Deal with it.
@60 Nope.. it'd be terrible.
@62 Better me than someone else... or so that's what I keep telling myself. In the end though I hate nobody here other that 2 members who aren't really spammers so them hating me only bothers me for a short bit and not really overall.
@63 Yes, please do. :)

By popular demand:

ImANargleHunter said
As soon as I get the least bit irritated you start acting victimized. You realize the joke was offensive but don't agrre with what I'm saying.Pro tip: If someone says you're being offensive reevaluate what you are doing. If you didn't realize what you were doing was uncool, that's fine. Learning experience. Work to be better. Don't act like I'm being mean for calling you out on it.

You should probably read the edit I made. Just saying... I did agree with you and Halo. What I didn't agree with was the whole deal that you made it up to be, which was that "I personally believe that women have no right to be angry unless on their periods."...

I'm not acting that you're being mean for calling me out, I'm just saying you're calling me out on shit that I already talked about with Halo and demanding more on an issue that was completely settled. You see that the conversation is over yet still you persist on getting more when there is nothing more to be said. It's almost like you want me to call myself a sexist asshole who doesn't give two shits about women's rights, which is as far from the truth as you could be. That's my perspective of the issue. I said everything that needed to be said and still you come and pursue me for more when there was nothing more to give.

Sometimes...

Halo said
... I try other forums, just to see what they're like. Then I realise that as stupid as Spam can be, it's so much better than anywhere else.
Please never leave me. ;-;

Spam's #1 xD

By popular demand:

ImANargleHunter said
There is literally no way to make a "time of the month" joke in good taste. It's stupid and invalidating and not even funny to anyone except for sexist jackasses who like to be able to erase any legitimate reason a woman might be angry or disagree with them.

What more do you want me to say Nargle? I admit, the joke was bad taste, even for me. Yes, I shouldn't have said it. No I don't believe in that a woman has no right to be angry unless it's her period. No I don't know why I said it. Yes I'm sorry to you that I offended you with it.

There really is nothing more to say other than that Nargle. It was just a bad joke said for nothing. We just gone over this with Halo. So what more do you really want Nargle?

By popular demand:

Halo said
I'm just busting your balls. Making a point, as I like to do.

Oh...

I suck at seeing these...

fuck...

okay..

Sorry. :/

By popular demand:

Halo said
I can't quite equate this chivalrous view you believe you have with the assertion that women are only "allowed" to be "mean" when they're on their periods. That was my point. Not "lol I wanna brain some wominz". Anyway, I'm not the one you need to apologise to, if you actually want to apologise.

You miss the fact that I said that it was just some period joke to begin with, which I shown to admit when I responded to idle.I'm rather shocked that you even once believed that I was ignorant to believe that a woman can't be angry on her own right.

Also, I wasn't apologizing to you, even though I was originally talking to you to begin with and admitted to being wrong and the apology was to Nargle.

Goldmarble said
Eh, I believe in equality. I don't give a single fuck if you're a woman or a guy. I may resist hitting a woman, but if she is trying to hurt me? Then I have no qualms with hitting back, to protect myself.(If I did something that I deserve to be slapped for though, I will take it appropriately.)

I believe in equality as in, nobody should hit anyone unless it's true self defence from murder. Law even states that nobody has the right to hit another person unless in self defence. So, I won't hit anyone though I will defend myself though I just don't believe in hitting a woman or anyone for that matter unless it's really life-or-death and even then I might be very reluctant. :/

By popular demand:

Halo said
Cue the mighty lumberjack fury.Old fashioned in that way you refuse to physically abuse women, but enjoy the real psychological stuff - misogynistically reduce them to stereotypes and so participate in good ol'-fashioned society-wide systematic abuse of women? Thumbs up, bro.
Okay, yeah, I'm unnecessarily busting your balls here, but srsly, you're being an ass to Nargle here. The educational documentary "Shrek" taught me that dragons do occasionally marry asses, but that doesn't mean you must emulate them.

1) Lol at Shrek
2) Where I'm at it seems like I'm the only one who wouldn't hit a woman, even if I get hit in the head with a brick a few times by them. So it's seems rather lost tradition over here :/
3) I know, and yes I'm fully aware that it seems as though I'm being an ass to nargle, and that I'm currently the bad guy. So you know what, I'm sorry.

By popular demand:

Dervish said
Hockey is the only thing that keeps it contained, and Tim Hortons coffee contains seditives to reduce our blood lust.Wouldn't your dying odds be 33/33/33 then?

Dervish said
Hockey is the only thing that keeps it contained, and Tim Hortons coffee contains seditives to reduce our blood lust.Wouldn't your dying odds be 33/33/33 then?

25/25/50 would be more likely... I wouldn't like heaven or hell and probably just try to stay... Or reincarnate... that's always an option, right? :)

By popular demand:

Halo said
I've decided that I'd like to see Nargle and Drakel in the gladiatorial arena. My bet's on Nargle.

I would refuse to kill her... I HEAVILY believe in that "don't hit a woman" shit soooo...

I bet on nargle too... Plus she's like my sister in a sense and is kinda child still so that fight is a lose/lose either way.

I think I'd take my best bet in just dying with a 50/50 chance to go to either heaven, hell or purgatory.

situation normal

mdk said

Seems about right.