Freeshooter92

Fire Emblem Battle Royale

Asura said
It's not the same! It's not!As hilarious as a five foot odd skinny chick marching around as a general is, I'm goin' with the swords. :p

Remember when turning ross into a berserker meant the fiteen year old dude became a literal mountain of meat?

Fire Emblem Battle Royale

Asura said
It's not the same! It's not!As hilarious as a five foot odd skinny chick marching around as a general is, I'm goin' with the swords. :p

Oh, Amelia. We miss you...

Fire Emblem Battle Royale

Asura said
Except they get Aegis. Instead of paladins.Totally not bitter about a no Aegis+Pavise Knight Lord.

You get Iron hide, ya whiner.

Fire Emblem Battle Royale

Alright, I'll be back soon.

Fire Emblem Battle Royale

Asura said
>Kill a sorcerer>One shotPick.

You dare doubt the power of AXELORD STEAMBATH?! Besides, Sorcerers are not in this.

Fire Emblem Battle Royale

Are there legendary weapons? I'll cry if one of them get's a falchion or somesuch. Also, should Great lord count as heavy armor?

Fire Emblem Battle Royale

Asura said
Until a dark mage/sorcerer shows up and violates you with Nosferatanking. :p

Not if I kill him in ONE SHOT.

Fire Emblem Battle Royale

Asura said
I'd have gone with Lance Lord, but dat AEther too tempting.Also speed is where its at. Especially with what I'm planning.

BRUTE FORCE IS THE PATH TO VICTORY. Hector ran on that principal, and he was awesome. Eirika and Pegasus Knights ran on the opposite, and they suck. Ergo, the three S' (Slow, Sturdy, and Strong) are the way to go.

The Shift (Recruiting)

I'm in ur thread, botherin ur doodz.

Fire Emblem Battle Royale

Two sword guys(okay, one's a gal)... only differing by their flaw...