Avatar of Gwynbleidd
  • Last Seen: 6 yrs ago
  • Joined: 12 yrs ago
  • Posts: 1247 (0.27 / day)
  • VMs: 3
  • Username history
    1. Gwynbleidd 8 yrs ago
    2. █████████ 12 yrs ago

Status

User has no status, yet

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

Jorick said
Oh, okay, that makes sense. I wasn't sure if you were trying to say that was an advantage or disadvantage for women, or something else entirely. Turns out it was the something else category. I don't really have anything of value to add or respond with as far as this idea goes, so on to the next thing.


It's interesting stuff. I suggest picking up The Second Shift by Arlie Hochschild.

Jorick said We've gotten to the point where "gendered" slurs in the current generation are not actually tied to gender in any meaningful way. Ever hung out with some Australian dudes? They call each other cunts all the time. It's not quite so common in most other parts of the world, but it's gotten to the point where calling a guy a cunt is just a normal thing. Calling a woman a cunt no longer means "you are a women and therefore awful," it means the same thing as it does to men, which as I see it is basically one large step above calling someone an asshole but meaning the same kinds of things. Calling someone a dick has nothing to do with their penis or lack thereof, it's a lesser form of the meanings found in asshole.


I haven't hung out with a bunch of Australian dudes, lol. I've had it mentioned before, though. On the stuff about words evolving to mean different things, I can agree and understand that point of it. However, I will get to why I think it's still a damaging part of our society and psychology. Mainly because I feel the origin of a word still retains its power in more hidden ways that are embedded in our subconscious and other forms of our psychological make up. It creates a lot of confusion, which I find to be a problem.

Jorick said Side note: it's funny how so many of our insults are based on body parts, but hey, whatever works. Pussy and bitch have both taken on meanings that have nothing to do with gender, pussy being an insulting version of coward (and the term stems from words talking about cats, animals often viewed as cowardly, with the female genital use coming into prominence much later) and bitch being used to refer to someone whining and complaining, such as the meaning seen in "quit your bitching."


I can agree in a sense that pussy and bitch take on meanings that people don't intend to be insults relating to women. But, is it too much of a stretch to point out that most people today associate the word pussy with the female genital? On top of that, people are called a pussy when they are being perceived as a coward. The idea of being too much of a "girl" is attached to the statement whether it was intended or not. The same applies to the word bitch when it comes to the stereotype of women nagging and whining. Again, crying/whining like a "girl" or in this case, like a bitch. I'm suggesting it's a problem because while some people may not have the intention of insulting a guy because they're "acting like a girl", it's that they are doing it without knowing it. It's one messed up ride of confusion. And I don't like it.

I don't know if this is a good comparison, but… It's kind of like when a word like gay became synonymous stupid. People will say "We're not against homosexuals, but…" They will still say the word gay anyway. Looking at slurs through usage and psychology is a complex thing, and that's what I'm trying to do. I may never be able to weed out everything because it's a freaking mess to be honest. But I find the confusion, the exceptions, the distinctions, all of which eventually run into contradictions to be major problems.

Jorick said Slut and whore are the only ones that really have any grounds for being called gender-biased terms nowadays, but the fact that they're so easily used on men as well without seeming out of place shows that they're not truly directed to one gender alone, which is the one qualification I have for whether or not something is truly a "gendered" word or not.


They are easily used on men. But, when it happens it comes off as a joke or something to laugh at. At least when it happens amongst guys I know, and friends of mine when we have actually called each other sluts or whores. This is a personal example, so take it with a grain of salt. It doesn't reflect a whole. However, I'd still point out that there are clear negative connotations to the words slut and whore that sting when used toward a woman, that don't have the same effect when said to a man. Slut and whore stand out to me as specific words that are used to shame women for enjoying sex.

Jorick said See, my whole thing is that usage is what matters, not the supposed origin or supposed meanings of the terms. The fact that cunt started off as a slang term for vagina doesn't mean that using the term is a jab at women. The meanings of words change over time, so claiming their gender of origin makes them a "gendered slur" that is extra insulting for one gender is just stupid. Anyone who gets more offended by being called a bitch than they are about being called a dick is just a hyper-sensitive turd who needs to stop seeking sexism; when you look hard enough for something, you're gonna find it eventually.


Usage does matter. 100% agreed. But, the origins do matter in some sense. Or perhaps, a lot of senses. As you said, amongst Australian guys the word cunt does not necessarily mean to be a jab at women at all. But, I'd point out that the easy-going usage of words, and the remarkable ease in which we toss around words like, cunt, bitch, pussy, slut, whore, bitch, etc. to be a problem because eventually there will be confusion, and that normally means trouble.

Personally, I don't get insulted when I get called a dick. One, it's never really happened, especially by someone I don't know. Nor do I get insulted if I get called a bitch. I'm educated enough to know meanings behind insults and that if they were ever trying to compare me to a girl that I wouldn't be insulted. Cus, women are pretty awesome people. Jokes aside, with the high amounts of usage of bitch, pussy, slut, whore, etc. there will be issues. As said before, while there is not the intention, there is still a connection with where the term come forms that will resonate with someone's conscience.

It kind of sucks. Especially when we get to it that women say these things to each other too. It's a collective cultural problem where these words are tossed around and then women internalize these insults and begin to shame themselves and each other. See: Virgin/Whore dichotomy, plus things like issues people have with females being their boss.

I don't like these words, personally. Note: when it comes to consent behind closed doors, that's up to the couple

What I'm saying is that there are not many words that shame men or have the same "sting" and internalization effect that specific slurs have towards women.
Magic Magnum said
I realize there are still issues for women here like maternity leave. I wasn't trying to say there wasn't, but those things have been listed and argued for millions of times now.But the issues facing men are largely ignored or brushed off, so I felt specific need to bring those up when the topic was about if we're feminist or not and why.As for feminism = Gender equality.This leads me to one big question right off the bat. If this is true why is it called inism?


Not saying you were. Nor do I disagree that there are issues that face men that are ignored or brushed off.

Feminism is called feminism because it is gender equality for women. For women to become equal with men. It has not been achieved yet. I feel we spend to much time deciding to be feminist, men's rights activist, egalitarian, humanist, etc. Why can't I be all of them? I would not hold myself to a single label or thought. I feel these activist organizations intersect when they are genuinely for what they hope to accomplish.

Magic Magnum said Other than that, I'd argue simply looking at feminist today that seems to be pretty split down the middle.You've got plenty of those who do want gender equality, and plenty who don't.Hell I've been called "The reason feminism still needs to exist" simply for saying that I was a humanist.


Eh, I stay away from this. These things are hard to quantify, so this just ends up being opinions that can't really be argued with evidentiary support. Again, that is your experience with one or a few other people. There are a ton of people. I like to avoid generalizing things by using my personal experiences.

Magic Magnum said Globally yes, but individually you've got the 3rd world countries where it's still a big issue. Then 1st world countries where for many of them it's not an issue.You can't just say "Globally women are treated like less" and then address every country like that's an issue.That's like saying "Globally people are starving" and then solving that by starting food drives and charities for Americans.You need to look at area's in a case by case basis.


It's a bigger issue in 3rd world, no doubt. But there's still improvement needed for 1st world as well. And I was not saying that, I was pointing out that globally, discrimination is a big issue in 3rd world countries so feminism is still necessary. But I also pointed out that we are specifically talking about 1st world, and 1st world countries still are not all the way there. I was not trying to imply that other countries are the same case as the USA.

Magic Magnum said Also like I said above, I agree there are issues women still face. I never argued this, but there are also male issues.And at least with women issues the majority of people are agreeing they're treated unfairly and working to fix it.


I don't know if there is a majority of people agreeing. This is hard to quantify.

Magic Magnum said Men and their issues? Not so much... Many people just think of it as silly, or that somehow fighting for men's rights is sexist against women.You're half-right in saying fighting against women gender roles will help men. It would help by extension some men issues.


Didn't say that men's issues weren't being ignored or under evaluated.

Magic Magnum said But Ultimately all it does is make women accepted into everything, and men simply more commonly filling in the blank. Rather than say both men and women being accepted into everything.


It's not genuine feminist job to focus on everyone's problems. I have said before there is something to be said about solving problems one at a time. Distractions cause progress to slow down. True feminists are not trying to take away from men's rights. They're simply trying to elevate women to the same level. Once that happens, more progress can happen for both men and women. Meanwhile, there can be other movements to work forward and fight for men's rights as well. I find fighting about what movement is the right movement to be a complete waste of time.
Zaresto said
That might be because men do not get preggo. Not the fault of any patriarchy, just evolution.Although it still is tainted by those who give it a bad name. Acknowledging this, many feminists do little to quell these more radical feminists. Questions the priorities of many feminists, doesn't it?


I've never argued for an existence of a patriarchy. I've also never looked at anything regarding the patriarchy seriously, or have looked at any legitimate studies or works on the idea of a patriarchy with a finely constructed definition of what exactly a patriarchy is and does. Although, societies of the world have traditionally been male-dominated or "patriarchal". This is not to say it is the case in first world countries. Women in less developed countries are subject to more discrimination, much like women in older US times, and probably worse.

And, regardless. I'm not referring to only single women. I'm also pointing out that married women still take the hits to their careers while they also have husbands who are fathers of that child. More husbands should take leave as well.

The priorities of genuine feminists are on gender equality for women, why should they be the ones that have to quell radicals? It's not their fault if the media that is extremely sensationalist likes to grab extremist feminist words and spread them everywhere. I'd say the priorities of genuine feminists are where they should be.

Zaresto said Sure, I can see how women have it worse in other parts of the world, but for you to say that they don't have massive amounts of privileges above men here is downright ignorant.Let's see:-Male genital mutilation is acceptable-Men are constantly seen as the oppressor-Women get an average of 60% less time in prison-In the US, men are required to enlist for the draft-Men are seen as expendable (Drawing off previous point)-Men are seen as bad fathersOf course, women don't have alot of abortion rights, but that is about it.


Jorick pretty much said everything I wanted to say here.

Zaresto said They have the right to vote, they have equal pay, and they are generally adored by society. On the subject of sexual activity, I can see where the stigma comes from. Generally, women have a much easier time securing a partner, so it is seen, by some men, that "getting the girl" is an accomplishment. As for the fact that there are more gender-based insults associated specifically towards women rather than men, I'm going to have to ask for some examples.


Jorick again has pointed out that it is not exactly 100% equal pay. Adored by society? That's very debatable in a slut-shaming, and often times victim blaming society we live in. And whether or not women have an easier time securing a partner, it doesn't change the fact that shaming a woman for enjoying sex while letting men who can be equally promiscuous get off without any negative social judgment is wrong. When it comes to sex, everyone should mind their own business.

And with gendered slurs, Jorick has gotten to that. The worst things men are called are pricks, dicks, assholes, douchebag, etc. And most men don't really take these things seriously. Whereas with women, specific things that come from being a woman are cunt, pussy, slut, whore, and bitch. Also old time things like "You hit/throw like a girl." In these cases it's like being a girl is a big insult.

(Whereas Jorick has a stance opposed to the idea of gendered slurs, I lean more to that they are a bigger societal problem and I will get to that later)

Zaresto said Looking at it now, it seems that men have the short end of the stick, don't they?Media doesn't really matter. Even if it did, it still favors women. Also, why are you both a feminist and an egalitarian? Why not just be egalitarian and not have your movement correlate specifically towards women, and rather towards equality?


Media does not favor women. Not by a long shot. I'm not sure how you've come to this conclusion. And media matters quite a bit. The manipulation media can have on one's conscious and subconscious are pretty alarming.

I am both a feminist and an egalitarian because their ideals intersect with each other. Feminism is still needed in many parts of the world, and perhaps a bit less needed in more developed countries. Feminism is a well-established movement and it's easier to get things accomplished through feminism than start up a whole new movement and get distracted by so many other things. However, I still welcome discussions about rights for men and the problems men face. There is something to be said about efficiency in focusing on one problem at a time.
Man, I will respond to you Magnum and you Zaresto… But Jorick did such a good job of summing up most of my beliefs. Give me a moment to look at these things carefully.
Well, I should've seen how this was going to come up in the Modern Feminism thread. So, I decided I'd make a nice little place for people to discuss this. Whether you're pro-life, pro-choice, or perhaps a middle ground (I don't know exactly what that would like, but it's there).

Discuss why you're pro-choice, or pro-life, or whatever individual specific opinion you have on the topic. Personally, I am pro-choice. I also believe abortion to be a women's issue. If you agree or disagree, explain.

Be nice to each other everyone. :)
Jorick said Not sure what point Dark Wind was trying to make by bringing up maternity leave, but it's true that there's a huge discrepancy there even when you account for the fact that men don't get pregnant.


I was trying to get into some things about how there should be more men who also take leave. It would be nice to see men who are married to step up and take leave as well, so it isn't just women taking the hit to their careers. Also, I was trying to eventually get at issues like the second shift where women often work much more than men because they also do the brunt of the housework.

Jorick said The only similar insult for men is dick, so if you buy into the idea of gendered slurs and such (which I don't, as my phrasing should have made clear) there's a pretty clear bias.


What is your take on gendered slurs, then? I'm interested.

Also, what you had to say on including the less than ideal forms of feminism within the movement, I agree. I'm trying to say that while those extremists may call themselves feminists and have a claim to the name, I feel they suck and are damaging what feminism actually stands for. Also, I do not find a problem with challenging the misguided and problematic opinions of those specific groups of pseudo-feminists.

My intention is that I'd rather not have people place sweeping and unfair generalizations to what I feel is a great movement. As is any other movement that seeks for other sorts of equality. It makes me angry to see terms such as "feminazi" thrown around so easily. Since when did the slaughtering of millions of people become a joke? It's also extremely offensive to even be compared to the Nazi regime, or have genuine feminists be called that word when they're actually fighting for equality. My frustration is primarily with judging an entire group of people with loud groups of people who do not speak for those who are genuine about what feminism is actually defined as.
Tough questions, lol. So many good anime and so many great characters.

Hmm…

My favorites are Rurouni Kenshin, some parts of Naruto, Gundam Wing, Cowboy Bebop, Trigun, Hakuoki was fun mainly because I am fascinated by the history of the Bakumatsu and the Shinsengumi. Yu Yu Hakusho and DBZ are favorites since I grew up with them. Code Geass (I consider it to be the most finely constructed anime of all time, but perhaps that's because I haven't seen the full series of Death Note or Monster which many consider to be a masterpiece).

What I like about anime is the art. I also enjoy the silliness in its certain aspects. And, I like the political undertones and philosophical discussions that take place within the text. They can really make you think.

Favorite characters, oh boy. Heero Yuy, Duo Maxwell, Trowa Barton. The entire Gundam Wing cast if you must, lol. Kenshin Himura is probably my favorite anime hero (personal favorite). The next would be Lelouch if you can even consider him a "hero" per se. Hajime Saito is a great anti-hero and his life in actual history is fascinating. Spike Spiegel, Makoto Shishio, the list goes on and on.

If I had to recommend one anime to the world it would be Code Geass.
Magic Magnum said
If by heck of a lot to do you mean in less well off 3rd world countries then yes you're right.In 1st world though, not so much.


If we are talking certain things, not so much might be correct. However, there are still things there. For example, when it comes to the discussion of maternity leave, the stats are pretty skewed. Very few men leave their jobs for this, while a much higher percentage of women do. Something worth looking into.

And as I've said before, a big thing feminism today is fighting for is not for female domination, but for equality on a social level.

Magic Magnum said Gender inequality is not a fixed issue, but rather an issue that now plagues men and women equally.So having our counter to it being something that simply focuses on one gender is not appropriate to the problem we face today.It may of worked in the past, when women are clearly the lesser gender in terms of rights.


Women are still the lesser gender in terms of rights globally. But, we are primarily focusing on 1st world countries. I definitely don't believe it as an issue that plagues men and women equally. Socially, women face more systemic oppression than men. I do agree that men face prejudices, but it's not quite the scale that women face. Especially if we talk about sexual intercourse and the stigmas a very sexually active woman faces from men AND women alike. Or that a lot of insults that we use in the english language are associated with… women.

Gender inequality, women have the short end of the stick. Don't misunderstand me. Gender roles harms both men and women, however the roles of men are favorable in comparison. Fighting against the gender roles of women would successfully free men from their roles as well, no?

Magic Magnum said But as problems and issues change so must the way we approach and solve them.Sure, doing feminism might help women representations in media and gaming, acceptance in geek culture, more control of their bodies etc.


This would be a good thing. Representation of women in the media is awful because it also hurts men.

Magic Magnum said But what about the men and being able to report being raped or assaulted without being laughed at? To be able to have a decent shot at gaining child custody rather than starting off the court case with a huge disadvantage simply for being male?To be able to cry and talk about how they feel without being laughed at?To not always be the one expected to provide for the family, pay for everything their girlfriend/wife wants, do all the leg work/first moves simply cause he's male?To not always be pressured by the media to be ripped, tall etc?There's a lot of discrimination against men that people just ignore or cast aside just cause it's seen as culturally normal we were raised to treat this stuff like 'common fact' that men must be tough and the take charge people always.


And feminism, I mean actual feminism, agrees that these things should be fought against. A man is laughed at for reporting rape… Why do you think that is? It is most likely because of gender expectations that women are "weaker" and could not possibly rape a man. You won't get an argument with me on these things. I am feminist, egalitarian, etc. Many things. And it's not necessarily men always providing for the family. Women as a breadwinner or sole breadwinner are on the rise. So the expectation of men to provide for the family has gone down. And still, many of these problems stem from the gender expectations of women, which damage men in these ways, no?
Zacharius said
I think a number of feminist groups have taken it too far, but applying that to all modern feminists is not only inaccurate, but also damaging to a movement that still has a heck of a lot to do, both globally and within 'the West' which likes to look at gender inequality as a fixed issue, when in a lot of cases it isn't.


This hits the nail right on the head for me.

I think a lot of the negative media toward feminism has a lot to due with the negative perceptions for feminism. Often times, some feminists will not come out and say they are a feminist because there are certain negative stereotypes attached to it (most if not all are entirely false), and this is a damaging thing to a good movement. I tend to agree with postfeminist theory myself with regards to the modern views and repudiation of feminism.
what is the matter?
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet