Avatar of Halo
  • Last Seen: 7 yrs ago
  • Old Guild Username: HaloAssault
  • Joined: 12 yrs ago
  • Posts: 1979 (0.44 / day)
  • VMs: 1
  • Username history
    1. Halo 12 yrs ago

Status

User has no status, yet

Bio

PLEASE NOTICE ME HANK-SENPAI

Most Recent Posts

scribz said
Okay, that's fair. But I have no qualms with the no voters, they agree with me on 99.9% of the scottish narrative. We all want more powers, they so happen to believe to be able to get them in the UK. I'm wary, but i'm happy to respect and join them on the matter. I think Salmond left with integrity, and also quite strategically, to allow a new face to arise in what could potentially be a flash referendum in the next decade, if the 1970's is to repeat itself. I also agree with you that the state needs to change, but they won't change until electorial force is placed, my "threats" aren't voilent, nor are they something that is localized to yes voters, or to the rest of the UK for that matter. This change in dynamic is the best possible solution to uprooting a lot of the fallacy within the system in place, for the benefit of the whole of the UK. I'm not whining about the vote, nor am I hating on the rest of the country, any yes voter who does do that is abhorrent. So, to do your part, don't try and polarize the two of us, as you put it - 19th of September is the day scotland reunites, and i'm happy to be a part of that.


I never polarised either of us. You expressed a sentiment that I disagreed with and felt was one that could be damaging to the change that could bring Scotland and the UK's future happiness, and I stated that - and stated it to you; I accused other Yes voters of nothing. Not the same thing, not at all - and I never accused you of whining, or of hating the citizens of any country, either.

I think that entering negotiations with an attitude of anger, with grievances and grudges, will be unproductive and damaging, and that condemning Westminster for something they haven't even done yet is fundamentally wrong. If they do not devolve the promised powers, believe me, I will be right beside you and the rest of Scotland in criticising them for it. If they do.

And that is all I said. That is the only disagreement I had. In terms of reconciliation, of continuing to fight for change, of being proud of the huge turnout and involvement, I agreed utterly.
scribz said
I won't cut my grievances with the westminister state. I'm very happy with the movement on both yes and no sides to want more autonomy for scotland, and i'm more than happy about Westminister also equally seeing that scotland has less effect on english laws, as that's not fair. You're extremely bitter about all of this for entirely personal reasons, and it's ugly.


I'm bitter? I'm not the one issuing warnings and threats. Scribz, I just posted talking about how the fractures between Yes and No need to be healed so that Scotland can continue forward, continue with this incredible public participation in politics, and make positive changes for itself. I condemned holding onto grievances which won't help to heal those fractures, but I agreed with you on all other points. And I regret that the leader of the opposite party has resigned and acknowledge his political talent, his contribution to this country which I am very proud of too. I think that's less bitter a reaction than still holding those grudges, which will only hold negotiations back and make finding a positive solution for everyone more difficult. :/
If it seemed as if I was being bitter, I wasn't. As I said, the current status quo is a broken system that needs to be fixed. Believe me, the current government's decisions, and Westminster's decisions in the past, have had extremely negative effects on my life and on others', and I have my own problems with the current system for that. But I also believe that now is the most malleable time for change in my lifetime, and possibly for the remainder of my lifetime too - and that holding grudges and anger close to heart will only serve to fracture the Scottish population within itself, and the British population as a whole, and will mean that negotiations focus on each state trying to screw the others and look after itself rather than us all working together to make a better situation for everyone. People have to come to the table open, and people have to stay politically involved - that is what I believe and what I expressed, and I don't see any bitterness in that. Perhaps I expressed myself poorly before.
Dervish said
It's terrifyingly easy to contaminate a water reservoir. For example, if someone were to pour just 2 liters of oil into a 390,000 liter reservoir, the entire supply of water is pretty much undrinkable and capable of making people sick. I would not want the nightmare of having to try to replace and treat that much water when it's an essential service and trying to clean out the entire reservoir from any lingering contaminants. Plus, if that happened, the operator would probably be looking and crushing fines and jail time for not securing the water supply.So really, appreciate the efforts the guys in your municipality go through to make sure your water is clean and safe to drink as well as keeping up with demand. It's a very tricky line of work.


well that's fucked
please don't kill us
ty
In Halo 12 yrs ago Forum: Spam Forum
Azarthes said
obby?


obby indeed ;)
In Idle.... 12 yrs ago Forum: Spam Forum
Azarthes said
Oh yeah uhm oops...Fuck Scott <3


A bit of heart makes all the difference.
HAPPY BIRTHDAY LARFLEEZE

Dervish said
Plus, if you want proof it doesn't make people docile, just wait and see what happens when the water tastes or smells or looks off, which slightly higher flouride doses potentially will do. Public anger knows no bounds if the shit that comes out of their tap doesn't taste like bottled angel tears.


Could you, just, like, kill a bunch of people if you wanted to? Just fuck up the water content with rat poison or something? I mean, seems unlikely, but somewhere in the chain there's probably someone who could screw with the water if they wanted to.
In Idle.... 12 yrs ago Forum: Spam Forum
SPAMFIC
SPAMFIC
SPAMFIC
SPAMFIC
IF I CHANT HARD ENOUGH WILL THAT MAKE IT HAPPEN
In Halo 12 yrs ago Forum: Spam Forum
Azarthes said
Good you caught my deer punDoes are deers right?You don't have to answer that the song that talks about this popped into my head at that momentBut I wanted to type it anywyasWow my thoughts really want to be in this text box right now.


A Brief and Insightful Sojourn into the Mind of Aza.
In Halo 12 yrs ago Forum: Spam Forum
All does are girls, Aza.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet