Avatar of Jannah
  • Last Seen: 6 yrs ago
  • Joined: 12 yrs ago
  • Posts: 813 (0.18 / day)
  • VMs: 0
  • Username history
    1. Jannah 12 yrs ago

Status

User has no status, yet

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

gcold said
Feel free to omit analysis, its not mandatory.


It is for me ._.. I'm not at that part yet though. I'm on military, which will be one of the more difficult portions.
I skimmed over most of the rest of the revolution stuff and now I'm talking about Stalin and collectivization.
Rare said
Look at my NS :p


Dammit, Rare. There's no way I'm going that extensive. I could if I really wanted to, but I'm not. Not for a role-play >.>.
Pasta Sentient said
I had to cut out a fair bit...and even then I ended up using 7 paragraphs. China's got a long and involved history...


I'm just a sucker for detail when it comes to this stuff, but yea I'm cutting some stuff myself.
I feel like I'm going way too depth into this history section. I already have about three paragraphs and I'm not even into 1917 yet O.o.
gcold said
Vodka is a poison in its own right.


Vodka is love, vodka is life. Yea, I'm like a walking stereotype -_-.
Maxwell500 said
That would be lovely, all depends on the month we start I guess, I mean the leading theory is that Beria poisoned him. But I guess if he is dead you could still maintain Stalinism by having Molotov clutch the leadership, or alternatively you could make things really interesting and have Beria take power...it'd be hard with the latter, but I mean if he moved quickly with the NKVD against individuals such as Khrushchev, Molotov & Zhukov then he has a shot.


There's also a theory that Tito poisoned him, lol. It seems people like this theory about Stalin being poisoned. I [personally think it was possible, but there's really little proof for it. For the sake of RP though I might still retain that he was poisoned if I decide to go the Beria route. Maybe he can stage a coup within the party.

Also, I suppose I should choose a month. I want January since it's a chance to start things fresh for a new year.
Maxwell500 said
Jannah, please no Khrushchev this timeline :/


Well if this is 1953 I could technically still have Stalin in power for a few more years. Shit, I might just do that. Maybe he survived longer?
I'm personally an atheist myself, but I frankly don't give a crap if people choose to worship Jesus, Allah, Krishna, the Flying Spaghetti Monster, or whatever else. To each their own.
gcold said Since the USSR only existed after 1922, your history should be focused on the period between 1922-1953, though it wouldn't hurt to go into a bit of Russian history before that.Analysis is like a brief prediction of your nation's future directions, take a look at UK and PRC's profile, something like their analyses would be good.


I'd say the stuff leading up to 1917 and onwards is pretty relevant because of the revolution. I'll just use my own judgement on this since Soviet history is one of my strong points.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet